Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Daring few, patient many: Division of labor in decentralized foraging collectives.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Information-seeking decision strategies mitigate risk in dynamic, uncertain environments.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026

Same author

Fast, long-range intercellular signal propagation through growth-assisted positive feedback.

Cell systems·2026

Same author

Bayesian Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks at Stochastic Steady State.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

CAMP: a modular metagenomics analysis system for integrated multistep data exploration.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026

Same author

Complexity and dynamics of partially symmetric random neural networks.

ArXiv·2026

Same journal

Population Epigenetics: Deciphering DNA Methylation Diversity and its Implications for Health, Disease, and Evolution.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026

Same journal

Genomic signature of repeated transitions to diurnality in spiders.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026

Same journal

Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026

Same journal

seqLens: Optimizing Language Models for Genomic Predictions.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026

Same journal

The transcriptional and translational outcomes for pseudogenes in bacterial endosymbionts.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026

Same journal

800 million years of co-evolution in the green plant lineage - the case of LEUNIG and SEUSS transcriptional co-regulators.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair

gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair

Published on: October 6, 2014

Comparative testing of DNA segmentation algorithms using benchmark simulations.

Eran Elhaik¹, Dan Graur, Kresimir Josic

¹Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Houston, TX, USA. eelhaik@gmail.com

Molecular Biology and Evolution

|December 19, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a benchmark for genomic segmentation algorithms. Recursive segmentation using Jensen-Shannon divergence performed best, but performance varied due to arbitrary stopping criteria.

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Published on: December 13, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair

gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair

Published on: October 6, 2014

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Published on: December 13, 2024

Area of Science:

Genomics
Bioinformatics
Computational Biology

Background:

Accurate detection of homogeneous domains in genomic sequences is crucial for various biological analyses.
Existing genomic segmentation methods produce inconsistent results, hindering reliable domain identification.

Purpose of the Study:

To establish a standardized benchmark for evaluating the performance of genomic segmentation algorithms.
To compare the efficacy of different segmentation approaches using simulated genomic data.

Main Methods:

Generation of two distinct sets of simulated genomic sequences with varying domain characteristics (fixed-size vs. mosaic, differing GC content variability).
Testing seven established genomic segmentation algorithms against these simulated datasets.
Performance evaluation based on accuracy and consistency of domain detection.

Main Results:

Recursive segmentation algorithms employing Jensen-Shannon divergence demonstrated superior performance compared to other tested methods.
Algorithm performance was significantly influenced by the nature of domain boundaries and sequence composition.
Even the best-performing algorithms showed limitations, particularly due to the arbitrary selection of segmentation-stopping criteria.

Conclusions:

The developed benchmark provides a valuable resource for assessing genomic segmentation tools.
Jensen-Shannon divergence-based recursive segmentation offers a promising approach for identifying genomic domains.
Further research is needed to refine segmentation-stopping criteria for improved algorithm robustness.