Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Measuring morbidity: self-report or health care records?
Julie Barber1, Sara Muller, Tracy Whitehurst
1Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Background:
Epidemiological surveys often rely on self-report as a measure of morbidity in a population. However, these data can also be extracted from primary care records.
Objective:
To compare morbidity estimates based on self-report with those obtained from primary care records.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey and accompanying medical record review were carried out in all consenting adults aged > or =50 years in three general practices in North Staffordshire, UK. Self-reported morbidity was compared with computerized general practice consultation records for the 2 years prior to the survey.
Results:
Of the 7878 survey responders, 5889 consented to medical record review. Agreement between self-reported and consultation data was excellent for diabetes. Agreement between the two sources of data was lower for hypertension, heart problems, chest problems and eyesight problems. It was poor for deafness and falls.
Conclusions:
Self-report and consultation data provide comparable estimates of the prevalence of specific diagnoses such as diabetes. For other conditions, self-report and consultation records provide different measures of prevalence, and the choice of measure will depend on the morbidity being studied.
Related Concept Videos
Data Reporting and Recording
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Data Collection I
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Purpose of Health Records II
