Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
08:12
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
Predicting sentencing for low-level crimes: comparing models of human judgment
Bettina von Helversen1, Jörg Rieskamp
1Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. Bettina.vonhelversen@unibas.ch
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|December 23, 2009
Summary
Legal decision-making, particularly sentencing, often overlooks cognitive processes. Prosecutors consider limited factors, using heuristics rather than complex legal policy, impacting sentencing consistency.
Area of Science:
- Legal Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Criminal Justice
Background:
- Legal decision-making frameworks often disregard the cognitive processes of legal professionals.
- Sentencing decisions, especially for low-level offenses, face challenges due to high caseloads and time pressures.
- Understanding the cognitive underpinnings of sentencing is crucial for aligning legal practice with policy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cognitive processes influencing prosecutorial sentencing recommendations.
- To determine if sentencing decisions align with established legal policy and theory.
- To identify key factors affecting sentencing in larceny, fraud, and forgery cases.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of trial records for larceny, fraud, and forgery cases.
- Application of a Bayesian approach to evaluate five distinct models of human judgment.
- Comparison of models to predict prosecutorial sentencing recommendations and identify influencing factors.
Main Results:
- Sentencing factors considered by prosecutors were generally consistent with the penal code.
- Prosecutors focused on a limited set of factors, neglecting legally significant ones.
- The mapping model, a heuristic quantitative estimation, best described prosecutorial sentencing, not policy-recommended judgment models.
Conclusions:
- Prosecutorial sentencing recommendations are influenced by case categorization and heuristics, diverging from recommended legal judgment policies.
- Cognitive biases and practical constraints may lead to simplified decision-making in sentencing.
- Further research is needed to bridge the gap between cognitive realities and legal policy in judicial decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
01:16Models, Theories, and Laws
Scientists frequently use models to help them comprehend a specific collection of phenomena. In physics, a model is a condensed version of a physical system that is too complex to study thoroughly. One such example is the light wave model; unlike water waves, light waves are typically invisible to us. Nonetheless, it is helpful to think of light as being composed of waves, since investigations show that light behaves like water waves. Since it is impossible to visually see what is genuinely...
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
01:29Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
01:15Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
01:29Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...