Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

08:12
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
3.0K
A theory of multiattribute search and choice
Sebastian Gluth1, Jordan Deakin1, Jörg Rieskamp2
1Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg.
Psychological Review
|March 19, 2026
Summary
Humans efficiently search information for decisions with multiple options and attributes. A new cognitive model explains how attention guides this search toward the best choice, matching empirical data.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Decision Science
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- Decision-making often involves numerous options with multiple attributes, requiring efficient information processing.
- Individuals must limit information search to manage cognitive load during complex choices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and test a novel hierarchical Bayesian cognitive model of information search in multiattribute, multialternative decisions.
- To explain how attention is allocated in a goal-directed, efficient manner during decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Development of a hierarchical Bayesian cognitive model for information search.
- Conducting a preregistered eye-tracking experiment minimizing bottom-up attention influences.
- Testing the model's ability to account for empirical findings and predict choice dynamics.
Main Results:
- The proposed model successfully explains established findings like the correlation between gaze time and choice probability.
- The model accounts for attention-choice interactions in multiattribute decisions, outperforming alternative theories.
- The model predicts decision speed dependencies on option quantity and value.
Conclusions:
- The hierarchical Bayesian model offers a robust framework for understanding attention and search in complex decisions.
- The findings highlight the goal-directed nature of information search, influenced by evidence, importance, and uncertainty.
- This research advances our understanding of the interplay between search, attention, and valuation mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
14.2K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.2K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
857
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
857
Decision Making: P-value Method
7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Reason and Intuition
7.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.7K
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
226
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
226
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.9K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.9K

