Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning01:19

Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning

Shaping is a technique used in operant conditioning to train complex behaviors by rewarding successive approximations toward the target behavior. This method is necessary because organisms are unlikely to perform complex behaviors spontaneously. Instead, shaping breaks down the desired behavior into small, manageable steps.
The steps involved in shaping begin with reinforcing any response that resembles the desired behavior. For example, parents might praise a child for picking up one toy. As...
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers01:23

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
Operant Conditioning01:21

Operant Conditioning

Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A computational model of reward learning and habits on social media.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Reference-point dependent reinforcement learning in humans and rats.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Context induces distortions in value representations across multiple elicitation methods and learning modalities.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A theory of multiattribute search and choice.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Beyond computational equivalence: the behavioral inference principle for machine consciousness.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

Genuine learning biases persist after accounting for temporally decreasing learning rates: Insight from fitting six datasets.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Sub1 contributes to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction driven by aging in mice.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

The BRCA1-A complex restricts replication fork reversal-dependent DNA repair in ATM deficient cells.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Signaling downstream of tumor-stroma interaction regulates mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma apicobasal polarity.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Click-polymerized polyenamine membranes for efficient lithium extraction.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Joint trajectories of brain atrophy, white matter hyperintensities and cognition quantify brain maintenance.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Proton shuttling at electrochemical interfaces under alkaline hydrogen evolution.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

Attention modulates value normalization in human reinforcement learning by shaping reward encoding.

Romane Cecchi1, Sebastian Gluth2, Stefano Palminteri3

  • 1Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, INSERM U960, Paris, France. romane.cecchi@gmail.com.

Nature Communications
|June 21, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Attention influences how we value choices in reinforcement learning. By tracking eye movements, researchers found that directing attention to specific options increases their subjective worth, refining computational models.

More Related Videos

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Contextual valuation in reinforcement learning (RL) is often explained by range normalization.
  • Deviations from range normalization occur with equally spaced values, suggesting other factors are at play.
  • Attentional processes are hypothesized to cause these distortions in value representation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of attention in outcome normalization within reinforcement learning.
  • To test if attentional manipulation causally affects subjective valuation of options.
  • To develop an RL model incorporating attention to explain observed valuation biases.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted three experiments with 105 participants, using eye-tracking to monitor gaze position.
  • Manipulated participant attention using top-down and bottom-up attentional cues.
  • Developed a novel reinforcement learning model integrating attentional mechanisms (attentional range model).

Main Results:

  • Attentional manipulations significantly increased the subjective valuation of attended options.
  • Gaze duration was found to modulate the absolute value of options before range normalization.
  • The proposed attentional range model provided a better fit than attention-free models.

Conclusions:

  • Attention plays a causal role in shaping value representation during decision-making.
  • The attentional range model successfully accounts for observed deviations in contextual valuation.
  • Integrating attentional mechanisms is crucial for accurate computational models of value computation.