Related Experiment Videos
Retention of pins in amalgam
R L Cooley1, T D Marshall, L Earnest
1University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
American Journal of Dentistry
|February 1, 1991
Summary
The Max 021 titanium alloy pin showed lower retention in amalgam compared to the Link Plus pin. Link Plus pins required significantly more force to fail, indicating superior retention in dental amalgam restorations.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Retention pins are crucial for reinforcing dental amalgam restorations.
- Titanium alloy pins offer biocompatibility and strength for dental applications.
- Evaluating pin retention is essential for long-term restoration success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the retention strength of the Max 021 titanium alloy self-threading pin against the Link Plus titanium alloy self-threading pin in amalgam.
- To determine the failure modes of each pin type under tensile load.
Main Methods:
- Fifteen amalgam specimens were prepared with either Max 021 or Link Plus pins.
- Specimens were subjected to a continuous tensile force using an Instron Testing Machine at a rate of 1 mm/min until failure.
- Failure forces and modes were recorded and analyzed.
Main Results:
- The Max 021 pin required a mean force of 87.6 N for failure, primarily due to amalgam fracture with intact pin retrieval.
- The Link Plus pin required a significantly higher mean force of 180.4 N for failure, with the pin itself fracturing.
- A statistically significant difference in retention strength was observed between the two pin types.
Conclusions:
- The Link Plus titanium alloy self-threading pin exhibits significantly greater retention in amalgam compared to the Max 021 pin.
- The failure mechanism differs, with Max 021 pins failing due to amalgam integrity and Link Plus pins failing due to pin fracture.
- These findings have implications for selecting appropriate retention pins in clinical restorative dentistry.