Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience.

John R Romanelli1, Thomas B Roshek, David C Lynn

  • 1Department of Surgery, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA 01199, USA. john.romanelli@bhs.org

Surgical Endoscopy
|December 30, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Presence of type 1 hiatal hernia affects the clinical efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy.

Surgical endoscopy·2025
Same author

The effect of per-oral endoscopic myotomy by achalasia subtype as measured by impedance planimetry.

Surgical endoscopy·2024
Same author

Impedance planimetry during per-oral endoscopic myotomy is associated with decreased inadvertent capnoperitoneum.

Surgical endoscopy·2023
Same author

What role does the submucosa play in the pathophysiology and treatment of achalasia? An analysis of impedance planimetry during POEM.

Surgical endoscopy·2023
Same author

Long-Term, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Mesh (Phasix Mesh) for Hernia Repair in Cohort at Risk for Complication: 60-Month Follow-Up.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2022
Same author

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of non-achalasia esophageal dysmotility disorders: experience from a single high-volume center.

Surgical endoscopy·2022
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a promising, feasible technique for gallbladder removal. While safe for most patients, further studies are needed to confirm its superiority over traditional methods.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Technology
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • The trend towards less invasive surgical techniques has led to the development of single-port devices.
  • The TriPort system and SILS Port enable laparoscopic surgery through a single small incision.
  • This study evaluates the safety and reliability of these devices for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility and safety of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • To compare operative times with standard four-port laparoscopic surgery.
  • To identify patient demographics suitable for this approach.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective data collection from March 2008 to June 2009.
  • 22 patients underwent attempted single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data included demographics, operative time, complications, and conversion rates.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful completion in 21 of 22 patients (95.5%).
    • Mean operative time was 80.8 minutes, comparable to standard procedures.
    • One complication (Richter's hernia) and one conversion to four-port surgery occurred.

    Conclusions:

    • Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible and promising technique.
    • Patient selection and instrumentation refinements are key for wider adoption.
    • Further research is required on safety, cost-effectiveness, and patient outcomes.