Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Cutting-Edge Robotic Heller Myotomy Protocol for Treatment of Achalasia
Published on: February 16, 2024
Presence of type 1 hiatal hernia affects the clinical efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy
Matthew F Mikulski1, Zachary R Stickney2, Giulia S Rizzo2
1Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School - Baystate Medical Center, 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA. matthew.mikulski@baystatehealth.org.
Background:
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a valuable treatment option for achalasia and non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders, but little is known about the effect of type 1 hiatal hernias (T1HH) on POEM outcomes. We hypothesized there would be no difference in technical success or pre- or post-POEM Eckardt scores between those with and without T1HH.
Methods:
This single-institution, retrospective review analyzed consecutive POEM cases from 6/10/2011-7/16/2024. T1HH were defined by esophagogastroduodenoscopy, manometry, contrast esophagram, or computed tomography imaging. Technical success included an 8 cm myotomy including the esophagogastric junction and extending 2 cm distal. Clinical success was defined as post-POEM Eckardt score ≤ 3. Demographics, T1HH, and pre- and post-procedural Eckardt scores were analyzed using descriptive, univariate, and multivariable logistic regression statistics.
Results:
There were 173 POEM cases. Of these, 95(55%) were female, 34(20%) had T1HH, 148(86%) were performed for achalasia, median Eckardt scores were 7[IQR:5.3-9] pre-POEM and 0[IQR:0-1] post-POEM, with clinical success in 146(86%), length of myotomy was median 12[IQR:12-13]cm with technical success in 170(98%). There were no differences found between those with and without T1HH in terms of sex, achalasia diagnosis, previous interventions, pre-POEM Eckardt scores, length of myotomy, or technical success. Compared to those without T1HH, those with T1HH had higher median post-POEM Eckardt scores (median 0[IQR:0-1] vs. 0[IQR:0-0], p = 0.043), lower rates of clinical success (n = 26(76%) vs n = 120(86%), p = 0.01), and had a shorter distance from incisors to EGJ (40[IQR:38.3-41] vs 41[39-43]cm, p = 0.044). After adjustment, presence of T1HH was the only significant factor, conferring 0.13 odds (95%CI: 0.02-0.93, p = 0.042) of clinical success.
Conclusions:
POEM produces excellent outcomes in patients with and without T1HH. T1HH did not affect technical success of POEM, but decreased clinical success rate and was associated with higher post-POEM Eckardt scores. POEM practitioners should be cognizant of T1HH and advise patients of its potential implications in their treatment plan.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....

