Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
High-frequency Ultrasound Imaging of Mouse Cervical Lymph Nodes
Published on: July 25, 2015
Where is it? The utility of biopsy-site photography
Malcolm Ke1, Danielle Moul, Melissa Camouse
1Division of Dermatology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. mke@mednet.ucla.edu
Background:
With wrong-site surgery being one of the major causes of medical lawsuits in the United States, tools to confirm location are essential. A previous survey of 300 Mohs surgeons revealed that 14% of malpractice cases were due to wrong-site surgery. In dermatologic surgery, photography is helpful in precisely locating biopsy sites.
Objectives:
We present a case series of 34 biopsy-proven cutaneous head and neck malignancies performed in our university-based dermatology clinic, comparing the reliability of patient and blinded dermatologist identification with that of biopsy-site photography.
Results:
Of 34 biopsy sites, the patient and the blinded dermatologist incorrectly identified four (12%). The patient alone incorrectly identified an additional six biopsy sites, resulting in a total of 10 (29%) cases incorrectly identified by the patient. There were no instances in which the patient correctly identified the biopsy site and the blinded dermatologist incorrectly identified it.
Conclusion:
In our current medical environment, in which more than 90% of health care is delivered in a clinic setting, wrong-site surgery is certainly underreported. In adopting a zero-tolerance policy for wrong-site surgeries, biopsy-site photography saves time, money, and potential frustration, hopefully eliminating the number of excisions performed on the wrong site.
