Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

Open and closed-loop control systems

Open and closed-loop control systems

Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal and...

Linear Momentum in Control Volume

Linear Momentum in Control Volume

Newton's second law is applied to obtain the linear momentum in a control volume in a fluid system. According to this law, the rate of change of linear momentum is equal to the sum of external forces acting on the system. When a control volume matches the fluid system at a specific moment, the forces acting on both are identical. Reynolds transport theorem helps explain this by breaking down the system's linear momentum into two components: the rate of change of linear momentum within the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Kinematic signatures in reaching movements during spaceflight provide evidence that humans underestimate body mass in microgravity.

eLife·2026

Same author

Physical contact reveals a hidden layer of cortical architecture.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Victims of Conspiracies? An Examination of the Relationship Between Conspiracy Beliefs and Dispositional Individual Victimhood.

European journal of social psychology·2026

Same author

Virtual flying experience changes neural responses to seeing wings.

Cell reports·2026

Same author

Modulation statistics allow robust prediction of speech recognition accuracy across many words, voices, and natural background sounds.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Modeling attention and binding in the brain through bidirectional recurrent gating.

Nature communications·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

Bayesian integration and non-linear feedback control in a full-body motor task.

Ian H Stevenson¹, Hugo L Fernandes, Iris Vilares

¹Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University and Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. i-stevenson@northwestern.edu

Plos Computational Biology

|December 31, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Human movement, like surfing, can be explained by optimal control models. The brain uses Bayesian estimation and optimal control, integrating information despite visual noise and task constraints.

More Related Videos

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Biomechanics
Robotics

Background:

Human reaching movements are often analyzed using optimal control theory.
The applicability of these principles to other complex, dynamic movements remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if optimal control principles apply to a dynamic, full-body steering task.
To explore how humans integrate sensory information under uncertainty in such tasks.

Main Methods:

Subjects performed a task simulating surfing/snowboarding on a force plate.
Movement data was analyzed using optimal control models combined with Bayesian estimation (Kalman filter).
Controllers included Linear-Quadratic-Regulator and Bang-bang models.

Main Results:

Observed human behavior aligned well with optimal control models incorporating Bayesian inference.
Evidence suggests subjects integrate information over time, accounting for sensory uncertainty.
Steering behavior showed non-linear responses to visual feedback.

Conclusions:

The nervous system appears to employ Bayes-like mechanisms for complex, dynamic tasks.
Human motor control in continuous steering tasks integrates optimal control with Bayesian estimation.
Task-specific costs and constraints likely influence motor control strategies.