Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fractures: Bone Repair01:27

Fractures: Bone Repair

Treatment for a fracture is based on the type of break, the bone affected, and the patient's age.
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Primary care patients' perspectives on CT coronary calcium scoring and exercise electrocardiography.

The European journal of general practice·2025
Same author

Scientific research in primary health care: Lessons learned from a pragmatic multicenter implementation study in 101 general practices in the Netherlands.

Primary health care research & development·2025
Same author

The Association between Diabetes Medication Use and Tumour Characteristics at Diagnosis in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Registry-Based Study.

Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2024
Same author

The Incidence of Pulmonary Embolism in Hospitalized Non-ICU Patients with COVID-19 during the First Wave: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in the Netherlands.

Journal of vascular research·2024
Same author

Trabecular, but not cortical, bone tissue protein synthesis rates are lower in the femoral head when compared to the proximal femur following an intracapsular hip fracture.

Bone·2023
Same author

Exploring why European primary care physicians sometimes do not think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis. A qualitative study.

BJGP open·2023
Same journal

Testosterone therapy in women: Keeping pace with the evidence.

Maturitas·2026
Same journal

Diagnosis and management of androgen excess presenting after menopause.

Maturitas·2026
Same journal

Domain-specific severity of menopausal symptoms and emotional eating in midlife women.

Maturitas·2026
Same journal

Energy-based therapies for vulvar lichen sclerosus: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Maturitas·2026
Same journal

Change of sexual activity and its relation to the quality of life in older people: Cognition of Older People, Education, Recreational Activities, NutritIon, Comorbidities, fUnctional Capacity Studies (COPERNICUS).

Maturitas·2026
Same journal

MSH4 and MSH5 variants in premature ovarian insufficiency: A literature review and case study.

Maturitas·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position
06:58

Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position

Published on: August 17, 2017

Individualizing fracture risk prediction.

Tineke A C M van Geel1, Joop P W van den Bergh, Geert-Jan Dinant

  • 1Department of General Practice, Maastricht University/Caphri, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. t.vangeel@hag.unimaas.nl

Maturitas
|January 8, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting fracture risk is crucial for clinical decisions. Tools like FRAX and Garvan calculator assess individual risk using bone mineral density and clinical factors, but require further validation in diverse populations.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position
06:58

Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position

Published on: August 17, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Osteoporosis Research
  • Clinical Decision Support
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Low bone mineral density (BMD) and clinical risk factors (CRF) are linked to increased fracture risk.
  • Individualized absolute fracture risk prediction is vital for clinical decision-making.
  • This prediction estimates a patient's likelihood of fracturing over specific periods (e.g., 5-10 years).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare individualized fracture risk calculation tools.
  • To highlight the integration of BMD and CRFs in risk assessment.
  • To discuss the current landscape and future directions for fracture risk prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of two prominent web-based fracture risk calculators: FRAX algorithm and Garvan fracture risk calculator.
  • Analysis of the input parameters used by each tool, including BMD and various CRFs.
  • Discussion of the methodologies employed in individualizing fracture risk assessment.

Main Results:

  • Both FRAX and Garvan tools incorporate BMD and common CRFs (age, sex, weight, prior fractures).
  • Differences exist in the inclusion of additional CRFs, fall risks, and the number of prior fractures considered.
  • Both models necessitate validation across diverse populations due to population-specific background fracture risks.

Conclusions:

  • Individualized fracture risk assessment tools are valuable for clinical practice.
  • Further validation studies are essential to generalize these models to different populations.
  • Future research should focus on validating the utility of these tools in guiding anti-osteoporosis therapy selection.