Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Creating Radio-cephalic Arteriovenous Fistula in the Forearm with a Modified No-Touch Technique
Published on: April 1, 2022
Arteriovenous fistula as stable venous access in children with severe haemophilia
1Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Department of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Milan, Italy. elisamancuso@tiscali.it
Insights
Internal arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) offer a safer alternative to central venous catheters for children with severe hemophilia, reducing complications and ensuring consistent treatment. This approach supports immune tolerance induction (ITI) and home-based care for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Hematology
- Vascular Surgery
- Hemophilia Treatment
Background:
- Children with severe hemophilia require frequent infusions for prophylaxis and immune tolerance induction (ITI).
- Adequate venous access is crucial for effective hemophilia management, with peripheral veins preferred but central venous catheters (CVCs) often used.
- CVCs are associated with infectious and thrombotic complications, potentially disrupting treatment, especially ITI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate internal arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as a safer alternative venous access for children with severe hemophilia.
- To compare the complication rates and usability of AVF versus CVCs in pediatric hemophilia patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and case reports on AVF use in pediatric hemophilia.
- Analysis of complication profiles, including infectious, thrombotic, and surgical issues associated with AVF.
- Assessment of AVF's suitability for home-based care and patient/parent acceptance.
Main Results:
- AVF demonstrates a lower rate of infectious complications compared to CVCs.
- AVF is user-friendly for home administration and generally well-accepted by children and parents.
- Potential AVF complications include postoperative hematoma, transient distal ischemia, and rare thrombosis; regular monitoring is essential.
Conclusions:
- Internal arteriovenous fistulas represent a promising alternative venous access for managing severe hemophilia in children.
- AVF facilitates consistent treatment delivery, particularly for immune tolerance induction, with improved safety and patient compliance.
- Surgical removal of AVF is advised once transition to peripheral venous access is feasible.
Abstract:
Treatment for children with severe haemophilia is based on prophylaxis and, if inhibitors occur, on immune tolerance induction (ITI). Both regimens require frequent infusions at early ages and therefore an adequate venous access is essential. Peripheral veins represent the best option; however, central venous catheters (CVCs) have been used to facilitate regular treatment. Unfortunately, survival of CVCs is affected by infectious and/or thrombotic complications that often lead to premature removal and consequent treatment discontinuation. This aspect may have an impact on treatment outcome, especially in the case of ITI. In light of this, internal arteriovenous fistula (AVF) has been proposed as an alternative option because of a lower rate of infectious complications. Moreover, AVF is easy to use in the home setting and is well accepted by children and parents. The possible complications are postoperative haematoma and transient symptoms of distal ischaemia; one case of symptomatic thrombosis has been reported to date. Other complications include loss of patency, aneurysmatic dilatation and limb dysmetria. A regular follow-up is mandatory to allow early remedial interventions. Surgical AVF dismantlement is recommended as soon as transition to peripheral vein access is possible.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management

