Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
A 4-tiered classification of left ventricular hypertrophy based on left ventricular geometry: the Dallas heart study
Michel G Khouri1, Ronald M Peshock, Colby R Ayers
1Donald W. Reynolds Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center and Divisions of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9047, USA.
Insights
A new 4-tiered classification for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) refines diagnosis. This system better identifies patients with indeterminate LVH, revealing improved cardiac function and lower biomarker levels compared to traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Traditional classification of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) into concentric or eccentric patterns is based on LV wall thickness to chamber dimension ratios.
- A novel 4-tiered classification is proposed, utilizing LV concentricity and indexed LV end-diastolic volume (EDV).
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and validate a new 4-tiered classification system for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- To re-evaluate the traditional classification of LVH based on cardiac MRI findings and patient biomarkers.
Main Methods:
- Cardiac MRI was performed on 2803 subjects to assess LV mass, concentricity, and indexed EDV.
- LVH was defined by increased LV mass/height(2.7).
- Four geometric patterns were identified: thick, dilated, both thick and dilated, and indeterminate hypertrophy.
Main Results:
- Out of 895 subjects with LVH, 361 had "thick hypertrophy," 53 had "dilated hypertrophy," 13 had "both thick and dilated hypertrophy," and 468 had "indeterminate hypertrophy."
- Subjects with "both thick and dilated hypertrophy" showed lower LV ejection fraction and higher NT-pro-BNP and BNP levels compared to "isolated thick hypertrophy."
- Subjects with "dilated hypertrophy" had lower LV ejection fraction and higher troponin T, NT-pro-BNP, and BNP levels than "indeterminate hypertrophy."
- The "indeterminate hypertrophy" group exhibited higher LV mass but also better LV ejection fraction and normal biomarker levels compared to subjects without LVH.
Conclusions:
- The proposed 4-tiered classification system effectively subcategorizes concentric and eccentric LVH into distinct geometric patterns.
- A significant number of patients previously classified under eccentric LVH can be reclassified into an "indeterminate hypertrophy" subgroup.
- This indeterminate subgroup demonstrates superior LV function and comparable cardiac stress biomarker levels to those without LVH, suggesting a need for revised diagnostic criteria.
Background:
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is traditionally classified as concentric or eccentric, based on the ratio of LV wall thickness to chamber dimension. We propose a 4-tiered LVH classification based on LV concentricity(0.67) (mass/end-diastolic volume(0.67)) and indexed LV end-diastolic volume (EDV).
Methods And Results:
Cardiac MRI was performed in 2803 subjects and LVH (n=895) was defined by increased LV mass/height(2.7). Increased concentricity(0.67) and indexed EDV were defined at the 97.5th percentile of a healthy subpopulation. Four geometric patterns resulted: increased concentricity without increased EDV ("thick hypertrophy," n=361); increased EDV without increased concentricity ("dilated hypertrophy," n=53); increased concentricity with increased EDV ("both thick and dilated hypertrophy," n=13); and neither increased concentricity nor increased EDV ("indeterminate hypertrophy," n=468). Compared with subjects with isolated thick hypertrophy, those with both thick and dilated hypertrophy had a lower LV ejection fraction and higher NT-pro-BNP and BNP levels (P=0.001 for all). Subjects with dilated hypertrophy had a lower LV ejection fraction and higher troponin T, NT-pro-BNP, and BNP levels versus those with indeterminate hypertrophy (P<0.001 for all). Subjects with indeterminate LVH versus those without LVH had increased LV mass (by definition) but also a higher LV ejection fraction and no increase in troponin or natriuretic peptide levels.
Conclusions:
Concentric or eccentric LVH can each be subclassified into 2 subgroups, yielding 4 distinct geometric patterns. Many subjects currently classified with eccentric LVH can be reclassified into an indeterminate subgroup that has better LV function and comparable levels of biomarkers reflecting cardiac stress as compared with those without LVH.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

