Emergency department use after pediatric pharmaceutical ingestion: comparison of two national databases

Jennifer Setlik1, Mona Ho, G Randall Bond

  • 1Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. jennifer.setlik@cchmc.org

Insights

Estimates of pediatric emergency department visits for medication errors vary. The National Poison Data System (NPDS) offers a higher count than the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP), suggesting potential underestimation by both systems.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Estimating pediatric emergency department (ED) visits for medication-related injuries is challenging due to the lack of a gold standard.
  • A previous National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP) estimate reported 53,517 annual ED visits for unintentional pediatric medication exposure (children ≤4 years) from 2001-2003.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To generate a comparable estimate of pediatric medication exposures resulting in ED visits using the American Association of Poison Control Centers' (AAPCC) National Poison Data System (NPDS).
  • To compare the NPDS estimates with the existing NEISS-AIP estimates for unintentional pediatric medication exposures.

Main Methods:

  • The NPDS database was queried for electronic medical records of children aged 4 years or younger.
  • Data included unintentional pharmaceutical exposures requiring presentation to a health care facility (HCF) between 2001 and 2003.
  • Criteria were aligned with those used in the NEISS-AIP study for direct comparison.

Main Results:

  • The NPDS identified 178,513 cases (57,100 in 2001, 60,098 in 2002, 61,315 in 2003) meeting the criteria.
  • Hospitalization rates were 13% for NPDS versus 10% for NEISS-AIP.
  • The most common substances involved were acetaminophen, cough/cold preparations, and cardiovascular drugs, with similar distributions between the two databases.

Conclusions:

  • The NPDS estimate is higher than the NEISS-AIP estimate but falls within the 95% confidence interval, suggesting the actual number of ED visits is likely close to both figures.
  • As NPDS represents an actual count and NEISS-AIP an extrapolation, both may underestimate the true public health burden of pediatric medication exposures.
  • The NEISS-AIP extrapolation methodology may require re-evaluation to improve accuracy.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios01:26

Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios

Pharmaceutical poisoning can occur through various channels, impacting an estimated 2 million hospitalized patients in the U.S. annually with serious adverse drug responses. These scenarios encompass both therapeutic uses, such as drug toxicity, where even standard dosages can lead to severe central nervous system depression, and non-therapeutic exposures, including accidental ingestion by children, and environmental and occupational exposures.Unintentional poisonings often involve exploratory...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children01:29

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion01:26

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

In pediatric medicine, understanding the renal function and drug elimination nuances is crucial for administering safe and effective treatments. Newborns, in particular, display markedly slower renal functions than adults, profoundly affecting how drugs are cleared from their bodies. This slower drug clearance requires clinicians to extend the dosing intervals for many medications to prevent drug accumulation and toxicity while ensuring therapeutic efficacy.One key area where these adjustments...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption01:23

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption

Understanding the physiological differences in the pediatric population is crucial for effective pharmacotherapy. Neonates, infants, and children exhibit significant variations in gastric pH, gastric emptying time, intestinal transit time, and biliary function. These variations profoundly affect oral drug absorption, necessitating a nuanced approach to pediatric dosing.Neonates present with a unique physiological profile, having a gastric pH greater than 4 and faster and more irregular gastric...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism01:24

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism

In pediatric care, understanding the nuances of hepatic drug metabolism is crucial, as it significantly differs from that of adults. This divergence is primarily due to the developmental stage of drug-metabolizing enzymes, which affects how medications are processed in the body. In neonates, for instance, the activity of Phase I enzymes—critical for the initial breakdown of drugs—is markedly reduced, functioning at just 20–40% of the levels seen in adults. This reduction poses a challenge in...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution01:17

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution

Drug distribution in the pediatric population exhibits unique challenges and considerations due to the physiological differences between children, particularly neonates and infants, and adults. A crucial aspect of pediatric pharmacology is understanding how these differences impact the pharmacokinetics of various drugs, necessitating age-specific dosing strategies to ensure efficacy and safety.Neonates and infants have a higher total body water content, ~75%–90% of their body weight, compared...