Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

A Convenient Method for Extraction and Analysis with High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography of Catecholamine Neurotransmitters and Their Metabolites
Published on: March 1, 2018
Emergency department use after pediatric pharmaceutical ingestion: comparison of two national databases
Jennifer Setlik1, Mona Ho, G Randall Bond
1Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. jennifer.setlik@cchmc.org
Insights
Estimates of pediatric emergency department visits for medication errors vary. The National Poison Data System (NPDS) offers a higher count than the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP), suggesting potential underestimation by both systems.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Toxicology
Background:
- Estimating pediatric emergency department (ED) visits for medication-related injuries is challenging due to the lack of a gold standard.
- A previous National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP) estimate reported 53,517 annual ED visits for unintentional pediatric medication exposure (children ≤4 years) from 2001-2003.
Purpose of the Study:
- To generate a comparable estimate of pediatric medication exposures resulting in ED visits using the American Association of Poison Control Centers' (AAPCC) National Poison Data System (NPDS).
- To compare the NPDS estimates with the existing NEISS-AIP estimates for unintentional pediatric medication exposures.
Main Methods:
- The NPDS database was queried for electronic medical records of children aged 4 years or younger.
- Data included unintentional pharmaceutical exposures requiring presentation to a health care facility (HCF) between 2001 and 2003.
- Criteria were aligned with those used in the NEISS-AIP study for direct comparison.
Main Results:
- The NPDS identified 178,513 cases (57,100 in 2001, 60,098 in 2002, 61,315 in 2003) meeting the criteria.
- Hospitalization rates were 13% for NPDS versus 10% for NEISS-AIP.
- The most common substances involved were acetaminophen, cough/cold preparations, and cardiovascular drugs, with similar distributions between the two databases.
Conclusions:
- The NPDS estimate is higher than the NEISS-AIP estimate but falls within the 95% confidence interval, suggesting the actual number of ED visits is likely close to both figures.
- As NPDS represents an actual count and NEISS-AIP an extrapolation, both may underestimate the true public health burden of pediatric medication exposures.
- The NEISS-AIP extrapolation methodology may require re-evaluation to improve accuracy.
Background:
As no "gold standard" measure exists for the number of children evaluated in emergency departments (EDs) for medication-related injuries, the public health impact is based on estimates. In January 2006 the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report published a National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP) estimate on unintentional pediatric medication exposure to children < or =4 years of age that resulted in an ED visit: 53,517 per year for the period 2001-2003. We sought to generate a parallel estimate using American Association of Poison Control Centers' (AAPCC) National Poison Data System (NPDS) to see how these estimates compare.
Methods:
To match data reported from the NEISS-AIP, NPDS was searched for the electronic medical records of children < or =4 years of age whose call type was an unintentional exposure to a pharmaceutical that involved presenting to a health care facility (HCF) in 2001-2003.
Results:
178,513 met all of the criteria: 57,100 in 2001; 60,098 in 2002; and 61,315 in 2003. Comparing NEISS-AIP to NPDS: 10% versus 13% were hospitalized; 72% versus 68% were either 1 or 2 years of age; and the substance distribution was acetaminophen (8.1%, 6.8%), cough/cold (7.5%, 9.6%), cardiovascular (7.8%, 11.0%), anticonvulsant (3.6%, 3.2%), and vitamins (4.5%, 3.4%).
Conclusion:
These results are close suggesting that the actual number is near these numbers. The NPDS number is greater than NEISS-AIP point estimate but within the 95% confidence interval. As NPDS is an actual count and NEISS-AIP is an extrapolation from a sample, to the extent that every child presenting to an ED following a medication exposure is not reported to a poison center, both databases may underestimate the problem. The NEISS-AIP extrapolation tool may need to be reassessed.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution