Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

08:33
A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers
Published on: January 5, 2024
Assessment instruments for patients with fibromyalgia: properties, applications and interpretation
F Salaffi1, P Sarzi-Puttini, A Ciapetti
1Rheumatology Department, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy. fsalaff@tin.it
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology
|January 16, 2010
Summary
Assessing fibromyalgia (FM) requires evaluating key domains like pain, fatigue, and sleep. Standardized tools and consensus are needed for consistent patient care and outcome measurement in FM research.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Assessment
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Fibromyalgia (FM) significantly impacts multiple symptom domains and patient function.
- Current FM care lacks a unified approach to assessing its multidimensional effects.
- Existing outcome measures are borrowed or specifically developed for FM, leading to variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss the challenges and needs in assessing fibromyalgia.
- To review existing and novel instruments for measuring FM symptom domains and function.
- To highlight the need for standardized assessment in routine FM care.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on outcome measures in fibromyalgia clinical trials and registries.
- Discussion of various instruments used to assess key domains: pain, fatigue, sleep, physical and emotional functioning, patient satisfaction, and health-related quality of life (HRQL).
- Analysis of the advantages and limitations of selected distress screening instruments for FM.
Main Results:
- Key domains for FM assessment include pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, physical and emotional functioning, patient global ratings, and HRQL.
- A proliferation of instruments exists, but no unified approach or consensus on interpretation has been established.
- There is a continuing challenge in the standardized quantitative measurement and assessment of FM.
Conclusions:
- Further consensus is needed for a core set of measures and response criteria in fibromyalgia.
- Development of more refined instruments, standardized training, and cross-cultural adaptations are crucial.
- Integrating standardized quantitative measurements into routine clinical care is essential for improved FM management.
