Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Ablation vs medical therapy in the setting of symptomatic atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction
Andrew D Choi1, Khashayar Hematpour, Marrick Kukin
1Al-Sabah Arrhythmia Institute and Division of Cardiology, St. Luke's and Roosevelt Hospitals, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Insights
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly improved left ventricular (LV) function and symptoms in patients with LV dysfunction compared to medication alone. This suggests ablation is a superior treatment strategy for this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may improve left ventricular (LV) function in patients with LV dysfunction.
- No studies have directly compared ablation to pharmacologic therapy for AF in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) versus medical management for AF in patients with symptomatic LV dysfunction.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-control study comparing 15 patients undergoing PVI with 15 medically treated AF patients with LV dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤45%).
- Outcomes assessed included ejection fraction and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class.
Main Results:
- PVI group showed significant improvement in ejection fraction (37% to 50%, P=.001) and NYHA class (2.0 to 1.3, P=.01) after 16 months.
- Medically treated group had no significant improvement in ejection fraction (34% to 36%) or NYHA class (2.0 to 1.8).
Conclusions:
- Pulmonary vein isolation significantly improves LV function and symptoms in patients with AF and LV dysfunction compared to pharmacologic therapy.
- These findings support a randomized clinical trial to further evaluate ablation versus medical therapy.
Abstract:
Small, single-center studies suggest that catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) can improve ventricular function and reduce symptoms in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. However, ablation has not been compared with a pharmacologic strategy for AF. The authors evaluated patients with AF and symptomatic LV dysfunction (ejection fraction < or =45%) referred for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). They compared these patients with a matched cohort treated medically for AF and LV dysfunction via a retrospective case-control method. Fifteen patients (14 men, 56+/-11 years, 10 [67%] paroxysmal AF) with AF for 4+/-3 years underwent PVI. Baseline ejection fraction was 37%+/-6% and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was 2.0+/-1.0. Fifteen controls (13 men, 63+/-14 years, 11 [73%] paroxysmal AF) with AF for 5+/-4 years were treated medically for AF. Baseline ejection fraction was 34%+/-11% and NYHA class was 2.0+/-0.7. The groups were similar in all respects. During a follow-up of 16+/-13 months after complete PVI, ejection fraction improved (P=.001) to 50%+/-13% and normalized in 8 patients (53%). NYHA class improved to 1.3+/-0.5 (P=.01). In the medically treated group, after follow-up of 16+/-12 months, no improvement in ejection fraction (36%+/-12%) or NYHA class (1.8+/-0.7) was seen. Compared with pharmacologic therapy, PVI significantly improved LV function and NYHA class in patients with AF and symptomatic LV dysfunction. These provocative findings provide potent rationale for a randomized clinical trial comparing ablation with pharmacologic therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

