Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

A Methodological Approach to Non-invasive Assessments of Vascular Function and Morphology
Published on: February 7, 2015
Arterial remodeling in [corrected] subclinical carotid artery disease
Objectives:
We sought to identify clinical and/or plaque characteristics that affect atherosclerotic disease progression and arterial remodeling in the carotid artery with subclinical stenosis.
Background:
Increasing severity of stenosis has been associated with a higher risk of stroke. Factors that drive subclinical lesions to become stenotic plaques remain ambiguous. Carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been validated with histology to accurately quantify in vivo arterial morphology and plaque composition.
Methods:
A total of 67 asymptomatic participants with 16% to 49% carotid stenosis as demonstrated by duplex ultrasonography were imaged at 1.5-T with a carotid MRI protocol at baseline and at 18-month follow-up. Clinical and/or intra-arterial metrics with a significant association with change in plaque burden during multivariate analysis were evaluated for effects on lumen, wall, and total vessel volume.
Results:
From multiple regression analysis, intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) (p < 0.001) and statin therapy (p = 0.015) were identified as key determinants of change in plaque burden. The group with IPH compared with the group without IPH demonstrated luminal narrowing, with a mean +/- SD decrease in lumen volume (-24.9 +/- 21.1 mm(3)/year vs. -0.5 +/- 26.9 mm(3)/year; p = 0.005), a larger increase in wall volume (44.1 +/- 36.1 mm(3)/year vs. 0.8 +/- 34.5 mm(3)/year; p < 0.001), and no difference in total vessel volume (19.3 +/- 27.4 mm(3)/year vs. 0.4 +/- 42.4 mm(3)/year; p = 0.15). The nonstatin group compared with the statin group demonstrated outward remodeling, with an increase in wall volume (22.4 +/- 35.6 mm(3)/year(3)/year vs. 0.9 +/- 38.0 mm(3)/year; p = 0.026) and total vessel volume (19.2 +/- 36.9 mm(3)/year vs. -4.9 +/- 40.4 mm(3)/year; p = 0.019) and no difference in lumen volume (-5.8 +/- 26.6 mm(3)/year vs. -3.2 +/- 29.5 mm(3)/year; p = 0.72).
Conclusions:
IPH may represent an indication of accelerated plaque growth and impending luminal compromise in the subclinical carotid artery. Statin therapy may stabilize lesions by slowing or halting lesion progression. This phase of plaque stenosis (16% to 49%) may be a critical stage for intrinsic and extrinsic factors to affect the atherosclerotic disease process.
More Related Videos
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
08:42A Rat Carotid Balloon Injury Model to Test Anti-vascular Remodeling Therapeutics
Published on: September 19, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management