Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A qualitative study of the barriers to and facilitators of the delivery of medical assistance in dying services in Canada from the perspectives of involved professionals.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

After-Hours Use of the Electronic Health Record Among Medical and Surgical Specialists After Implementation of a System-Wide Integrated Clinical Information System in Alberta, Canada: Longitudinal Descriptive Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Descriptions and Experiences with Medical Assistance in Dying Models Across Canada: A Mixed Methods Study.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Family perspectives on high-quality MAiD service and delivery: a cross-Canada qualitative descriptive study.

BMC palliative care·2026
Same author

Disulfiram metabolite Cu(DDC)<sub>2</sub> enhances radionuclide uptake in vivo revealing insights into tumoural ablation resistance.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

Non-regulated but involved: Exploring the experiences of unregulated support providers in MAiD service delivery in Canada.

Healthcare management forum·2025
Same journal

Balancing Access and Value in Multi-Indication Medicines: Implications of PD-L1 Broad Listings in Australia.

PharmacoEconomics·2026
Same journal

Applications of Structural Expert Elicitations for Economic Evaluations: A Systematic Review Update.

PharmacoEconomics·2026
Same journal

Community Pharmacist Preferences for Providing a Dose Administration Aid Service in Australia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

PharmacoEconomics·2026
Same journal

A Critical Systematic Review of Modelling Approaches and Methodologies used in Hyperlipidaemia Economic Evaluations.

PharmacoEconomics·2026
Same journal

Deriving a Korean SF-6Dv2 Value Set Using a Discrete Choice Experiment with Duration.

PharmacoEconomics·2026
Same journal

Correction: Ten Recommendations for Modelling Cost Effectiveness of Screening: Perspectives of an International Stakeholder Group.

PharmacoEconomics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Access with evidence development schemes: a framework for description and evaluation.

Christopher J McCabe1, Tania Stafinski, Richard Edlin

  • 1Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. c.mccabe@leeds.ac.uk

Pharmacoeconomics
|January 21, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Healthcare payers face challenges balancing rapid access to novel treatments with reimbursement certainty. This study proposes a framework to evaluate and design innovative access schemes, using a UK Multiple Sclerosis Risk-Sharing Scheme case study.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Health services research
  • Pharmaceutical policy

Background:

  • Healthcare systems grapple with the tension between timely patient access to innovative medical technologies and robust reimbursement decision-making.
  • Uncertainty regarding evidence and efficiency of novel treatments complicates payer assessments.
  • Public perception and clinical pressure necessitate flexible access schemes for breakthrough therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel framework for evaluating existing patient access schemes for new medical technologies.
  • To inform the design of future healthcare reimbursement and access strategies.
  • To assess the utility of the proposed framework using a real-world case study.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current descriptive schemes for new technology access.
  • Development of a conceptual framework for scheme evaluation.
  • Case study analysis of the UK Multiple Sclerosis Risk-Sharing Scheme.

Main Results:

  • Existing literature on access schemes is predominantly descriptive, lacking evaluative guidance.
  • The proposed framework offers a structured approach to assess scheme performance and design.
  • The UK MS Risk-Sharing Scheme demonstrates the practical application of such evaluative frameworks.

Conclusions:

  • A structured framework is needed to guide the design and evaluation of innovative patient access schemes.
  • Such frameworks can help balance timely access to novel treatments with payer concerns about evidence and cost-effectiveness.
  • Further research should focus on refining and applying these frameworks across diverse healthcare contexts.