Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work
Jennifer J Kish-Gephart1, David A Harrison, Linda Klebe Treviño
1Department of Management and Organization, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA16801, USA. jjg303@psu.edu
Abstract:
As corporate scandals proliferate, practitioners and researchers alike need a cumulative, quantitative understanding of the antecedents associated with unethical decisions in organizations. In this meta-analysis, the authors draw from over 30 years of research and multiple literatures to examine individual ("bad apple"), moral issue ("bad case"), and organizational environment ("bad barrel") antecedents of unethical choice. Findings provide empirical support for several foundational theories and paint a clearer picture of relationships characterized by mixed results. Structural equation modeling revealed the complexity (multidetermined nature) of unethical choice, as well as a need for research that simultaneously examines different sets of antecedents. Moderator analyses unexpectedly uncovered better prediction of unethical behavior than of intention for several variables. This suggests a need to more strongly consider a new "ethical impulse" perspective in addition to the traditional "ethical calculus" perspective. Results serve as a data-based foundation and guide for future theoretical and empirical development in the domain of behavioral ethics.
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Motivational Bias
Halo Effect
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Social Proof
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...