Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus
Marie L Misso1, Kristine J Egberts, Matthew Page
1Australasian Cochrane Centre, Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168.
Insights
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) may improve glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes compared to multiple insulin injections (MI). While severe hypoglycemia may be reduced with CSII, evidence on adverse events remains limited.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Disorders
- Diabetes Management
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune metabolic disorder characterized by defective insulin secretion.
- It is a common chronic disease in childhood and adolescence, requiring effective management strategies.
- Current treatment involves insulin replacement via multiple daily injections (MI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of CSII versus MI in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
- To evaluate effects on glycaemic control, hypoglycaemic events, quality of life, and adverse events.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Searches conducted across major electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL).
- Data extraction and risk of bias assessment performed independently by two authors.
Main Results:
- Twenty-three studies involving 976 participants were analyzed.
- CSII showed a statistically significant improvement in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compared to MI (WMD -0.3%).
- Severe hypoglycaemia appeared reduced with CSII, and quality of life was generally preferred; no significant differences in weight or non-severe hypoglycaemia were noted.
Conclusions:
- CSII demonstrates potential benefits for glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes.
- Evidence suggests CSII may reduce severe hypoglycaemic events and improve quality of life.
- Further research is needed to clarify risks associated with adverse events, mortality, morbidity, and costs.
Background:
Type 1 diabetes is a metabolic disorder resulting from a defect in insulin secretion. Onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus may occur at any age and it is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood and adolescence. Since there are no interventions known to prevent onset, it is vital that effective treatment regimes are available. Glycaemic control is maintained by replacement of insulin and may be in the form of 'conventional' insulin therapy (multiple injections per day) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
Objectives:
To assess the effects of CSII compared to multiple insulin injections (MI) in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Search Strategy:
Studies were obtained from electronic searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL.
Selection Criteria:
Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials comparing CSII with three or more insulin injections per day (MI) in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted characteristics of included studies. Authors contacted study investigators to obtain missing information. Generic inverse variance meta-analyses using a random-effects model were performed.
Main Results:
Twenty three studies randomised 976 participants with type 1 diabetes to either intervention. There was a statistically significant difference in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) favouring CSII (weighted mean difference -0.3% (95% confidence interval -0.1 to -0.4). There were no obvious differences between the interventions for non-severe hypoglycaemia, but severe hypoglycaemia appeared to be reduced in those using CSII. Quality of life measures suggest that CSII is preferred over MI. No significant difference was found for weight. Adverse events were not well reported, no information is available on mortality, morbidity and costs.
Authors' Conclusions:
There is some evidence to suggest that CSII may be better than MI for glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes. Non-severe hypoglycaemic events do not appear to be reduced with CSII. There is insufficient evidence regarding adverse events, mortality, morbidity and costs.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into rapid-acting...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Type I Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Type I Diabetes I: Introduction
