Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Caveats and suggestions for the ELISA.

F H Pruslin1, S E To, R Winston

  • 1Laboratory of Cell Biology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021.

Journal of Immunological Methods
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

This study details three common errors in Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) procedures. It provides methods to identify and prevent issues with background noise, antibody binding stoichiometry, and blocking agents for accurate results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for the rare decays K(L)→π0π0μ+μ- and K(L)→π0π0X0→π0π0μ+μ-.

Physical review letters·2011
Same author

Tailored reflectors for illumination.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Dielectric totally internally reflecting concentrators.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Optics of two-stage photovoltaic concentrators with dielectric second stages.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Throughput of diffraction-limited field optics systems for infrared and millimetric telescopes: erratum.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Nonconventional optical systems and the brightness theorem.

Applied optics·2010

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Immunology
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) is a widely used immunoassay technique.
  • Procedural errors can significantly impact the accuracy and reliability of ELISA results.
  • Standard protocols may not adequately address all potential sources of experimental variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and categorize common procedural errors in ELISA.
  • To propose methods for recognizing and avoiding these errors.
  • To enhance the robustness and reproducibility of ELISA experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Curve analysis for validating background correction in optical density (OD) measurements.
  • Determination of optimal conditions for second antibody binding stoichiometry.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of blocking agents for preventing non-specific binding.

    • Main Results:

    • A method for assessing the validity of background subtraction in ELISA was developed.
    • Optimal concentration and incubation times for second antibody binding were defined.
    • Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) demonstrated superior performance as a blocking agent compared to alternatives.

    Conclusions:

    • Addressing background noise, optimizing antibody stoichiometry, and selecting effective blocking agents are crucial for accurate ELISA.
    • The study provides practical strategies to improve ELISA protocol design and execution.
    • Implementing these recommendations can lead to more reliable and reproducible immunoassay data.