Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

14:43
Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
Published on: July 18, 2020
Cognitive screening for children and adolescents: general limits or ceiling effects?
Laurel J Bornholt1, Susan Ajersch, Ian H Fisher
1Watervale Systems, Potts Point, Australia. laurelbau@yahoo.com.au
Journal of Child Neurology
|January 30, 2010
Summary
General cognitive screening for children shows scores plateauing in early adolescence, suggesting a true developmental limit rather than tool limitations. This impacts assessing cognitive development across age groups.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Cognitive screening tools for children may have limitations when used with adolescents.
- An apparent "ceiling effect" in scores around age 10-11 has been observed.
- This ceiling effect may stem from material limitations or a true cognitive limit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the "ceiling effect" in cognitive screening tools for children and adolescents.
- To determine if the ceiling effect is due to test materials or a genuine limit in general cognitive development.
- To adapt and validate the School-Years Screening Test for the Evaluation of Mental Status (SYSTEMS) for a broader age range.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a modified School-Years Screening Test for the Evaluation of Mental Status (SYSTEMS) with more challenging items.
- Recruited 85 participants aged 10–15 years.
- Compared results with a database of 1249 children aged 4–12 years.
Main Results:
- Cognitive screening scores increased rapidly in younger children.
- Scores tended to reach a maximum in early adolescence, forming an asymptotic curve.
- This asymptotic pattern explained a significant portion of the score variance.
Conclusions:
- General cognitive screening has an upper limit in early adolescence, despite continued development of specific functions.
- The study supports the use of cognitive screening tools across a wide age range.
- Findings suggest implications for research and clinical applications in cognitive assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Alfred Binet, along with his student Théophile Simon, was tasked by the French Ministry of Education in 1904 to create a method for identifying students who struggled to learn through conventional classroom instruction. This initiative aimed to address overcrowding by placing such students in specialized schools. Binet and Simon developed an intelligence test comprising 30 tasks, ranging from simple commands, like touching one's nose or ear, to more complex tasks, such as drawing designs from...
Information Processing Approach
The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is also...
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are themselves.

