Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
A model of learning clinical reasoning at a US-based workshop: interactive reasoning
Brian Taylor Slingsby1, Seiji Yamada, Gordon Greene
1University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI, USA. bts-tky@umin.ac.jp
Summary
Japanese medical students learned clinical reasoning and medical interviewing skills at a US workshop. They overcame language and cultural barriers to develop interactive reasoning abilities.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Clinical Reasoning
- Cross-cultural Healthcare Education
Background:
- University of Hawaii School of Medicine has offered a 5-day clinical reasoning workshop for Japanese medical students since 2001.
- The workshop aims to facilitate the learning of clinical reasoning in a US-based educational setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the learning process of clinical reasoning among Japanese medical students in a US educational workshop.
- To understand how students adapt to and acquire new reasoning skills in an international context.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study employing 20 semi-structured interviews with students.
- Non-participant observation and analysis of 40 standardized-patient encounters via videotapes.
Main Results:
- Students initially faced linguistic and cultural challenges but successfully acquired medical interviewing skills.
- Clinical reasoning was understood as a process involving patient rapport-building to gather information for differential diagnosis and hypothesis testing.
- A model of Interactive Reasoning was supported by the findings.
Conclusions:
- Foreign medical students can surmount linguistic and cultural barriers in US-based workshops.
- The study demonstrates successful acquisition of medical interviewing and clinical reasoning skills by international students.
Related Concept Videos
Critical Thinking II
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Reasoning
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Critical Thinking I
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...
Patient-centered Care
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...