Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variations in the Accuracy of Old-New Judgements Following Compound Learned-Predictiveness Training.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Affiliation in human-AI interactions is based on shared psychological traits.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Delaying reward feedback does not increase the influence of information on attentional priority in visual search.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Neurophysiological Evidence of Motor Preparation Dysfunction during Inner Speech and its Association with Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2025
Same author

Understanding sustainable cooperation.

Theory and society·2025
Same author

Corollary Discharge Dysfunction to Inner Speech and its Relationship to Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2025
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

Stereotype formation: biased by association.

Mike E Le Pelley1, Stian J Reimers, Guglielmo Calvini

  • 1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, United Kingdom CF10 3AT. lepelleyME@cf.ac.uk

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|February 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Learned differences in how predictive social groups are influence attitude and stereotype formation. This bias stems from associative learning, not higher-level reasoning or global evaluations.

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Attitudes and stereotypes are often formed based on perceived group characteristics.
  • The underlying mechanisms driving the formation of these group beliefs are not fully understood.
  • Previous research suggests associative learning plays a role in belief formation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether learned differences in the predictiveness of social groups influence attitude and stereotype formation.
  • To determine if this bias is rooted in associative learning or higher-level reasoning.
  • To examine if global evaluations of groups are necessary for this predictiveness bias.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were exposed to information designed to vary the perceived predictiveness of different social groups.
  • Attitude and stereotype formation were assessed following this exposure.
  • Experiments manipulated the cognitive processes emphasized (associative vs. reasoning-based) and the nature of group evaluations.

Main Results:

  • Differences in experienced group predictiveness significantly influenced subsequent attitude and stereotype formation (Experiments 1 & 2).
  • The predictiveness bias was not observed when higher-level reasoning was emphasized, suggesting it is not reasoning-based (Experiment 3).
  • The bias was independent of whether participants made global evaluations of the groups (Experiments 4 & 5).

Conclusions:

  • Attitude and stereotype formation are influenced by learned associations regarding group predictiveness.
  • The 'predictiveness bias' appears to be an associative learning phenomenon, distinct from higher-level cognitive reasoning.
  • Findings align with associative learning models, such as those proposed by Mackintosh (1975), in explaining group belief formation.