Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Looking Ahead: Advancing Measurement and Analysis of the Block Design Test Using Technology and Artificial Intelligence.

Journal of Intelligence·2024

Same author

"You gotta tell the camera": Advancing children's engineering learning opportunities through tinkering and digital storytelling.

Child development·2024

Same author

How Can We Best Assess Spatial Skills? Practical and Conceptual Challenges.

Journal of Intelligence·2024

Same author

Transfer from spatial education to verbal reasoning and prediction of transfer from learning-related neural change.

Science advances·2022

Same author

Examining the relations between spatial skills and mathematical performance: A meta-analysis.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021

Same author

Advancing opportunities for children's informal STEM learning transfer through parent-child narrative reflection.

Child development·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

Everyday scale errors.

Elizabeth A Ware¹, David H Uttal, Judy S DeLoache

¹Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043, USA. eaware@umich.edu

Developmental Science

|February 4, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Young children sometimes make scale errors, like trying to fit into tiny chairs. This study confirms these scale errors happen in daily life, not just labs, supporting visual processing theories.

More Related Videos

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

Area of Science:

Developmental Psychology
Cognitive Science
Child Behavior

Background:

Scale errors, where children attempt to fit their bodies or objects into inappropriately sized spaces, were initially observed informally.
Previous research primarily documented scale errors through laboratory-based procedures designed to elicit them.

Purpose of the Study:

To formally document the occurrence of scale errors in natural, everyday settings.
To investigate if scale errors observed in daily life align with those previously documented in laboratory environments.

Main Methods:

An internet-based survey was distributed to collect anecdotal reports of everyday scale errors.
Two studies analyzed participant-reported instances of scale errors committed by young children.

Main Results:

Participants reported numerous examples of scale errors occurring during children's daily activities.
The reported everyday scale errors were comparable to those observed in laboratory settings and involved children of similar ages.

Conclusions:

Scale errors are a common occurrence in children's everyday lives, extending beyond controlled laboratory settings.
These findings provide further evidence that scale errors may arise from general visual processing mechanisms in young children.