Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Measuring Spatially- and Directionally-varying Light Scattering from Biological Material
Published on: May 20, 2013
Improvement of absolute accuracy for a multiple bounce reflectometer through a detailed effort to reduce systematic
Abstract:
We have constructed a multiple-bounce reflectometer similar to the one designed by Kelsall. Systematic errors present the reflectivities measured on our multiple-bounce reflectometer have been significantly reduced for high-reflectivity mirrors. This reduction came about through careful study of all components in our system. The diffraction effects of the apertures in the reflectometer were studied with the aid of a computer program that calculated the radial intensity distribution due to the Fresnel diffraction from each aperture. The systematic errors arising from the attempt to measure a concave spherical mirror were studied and minimized. A second computer program calculated the systematic error introduced by pathlength changes as the number of bounces in the reflectometer increased. The replacement of the sample thermopile detector with a thin-film bolometer along with other equipment changes has improved the absolute accuracy to 0.001 for the measured reflectivities with a demonstrated precision of 0.0003. Previous measurements had been about 0.008 low compared to measurements on the V-W pass reflectometer at China Lake, California.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Accuracy and Precision

