Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Depolarizing blockers act on skeletal muscle fibers' membranes and induce their depolarization. Most depolarizing blockers have two quaternary N+ atoms that bind the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and cause neuromuscular blockade within minutes.
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers induce paralysis by competitively blocking nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the muscle end plate. Examples include pancuronium, mivacurium, vecuronium, and rocuronium. These quaternary ammonium derivatives are administered intravenously, are poorly absorbed, and are excreted via the kidneys.
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers prevent the membrane depolarization of muscle cells and inhibit muscle contraction. These are usually administered with anesthetics to achieve complete muscle relaxation. Upon administration, these drugs first block the small, rapidly contracting muscles of the face and hands, followed by the larger muscles of the trunk and the intercostal muscles. The diaphragm is the last muscle to be affected.
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...

Local Anesthetics: Mechanism of Action

Local Anesthetics: Mechanism of Action

Local anesthetics (LAs) block sensory and motor impulses by inhibiting the sodium channels on the nerve cell membranes. This induces temporary loss of sensation, relieving pain in a specific body area.
Local anesthetics are amphiphilic molecules consisting of a hydrophobic aromatic part linked to a hydrophilic group by an ester or amide linkage. They are weak bases and are usually available as salts, which increases their solubility and stability. Once administered, LAs exist in the body either...

Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

Depolarizing blockers are administered through intravenous injection. Succinylcholine is the most common choice of depolarizing blockers in emergency clinical practices. Although they have a rapid onset, they readily diffuse away from the motor end plate into the extracellular fluid. They are metabolized by enzymes such as liver butyrylcholinesterase and plasma pseudocholinesterases. This produces a short duration of action, typically 5-10 minutes long, unlike nondepolarizing blockers, which...

Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade

Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade

The site of chemical communication between a motor neuron and a muscle fiber is called the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). The end of the motor neuron at the NMJ divides into a cluster of synaptic end bulbs. The cytoplasm of these bulbs consists of synaptic vesicles enclosing acetylcholine molecules, the principal neurotransmitter released at the NMJ. The region opposite the synaptic bulb that ends in the muscle fiber is called the motor end plate, which has acetylcholine receptors. Within the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

13. Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain·2025

Same author

Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency of Dorsal Root Ganglion in Elderly Patient Population With Acute and Subacute Zoster-Related Pain.

Pain research & management·2024

Same author

Maximizing value in opioid utilization: Is oxycodone immediate release a good option for pain management?

Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology·2015

Same author

Complications of epidural neuroplasty: a retrospective evaluation.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2011

Same author

Ultrastructural changes in axons following exposure to pulsed radiofrequency fields.

Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain·2009

Same author

Use of analgesics in adults with pain complaints: prevalence and associated factors, Turkey.

Revista de saude publica·2009

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Electrophysiological Methods to Assess Peripheral Pain Block in an Anesthetized Rat

Electrophysiological Methods to Assess Peripheral Pain Block in an Anesthetized Rat

Published on: November 21, 2025

Neurolytic blocks: when, how, why.

Serdar Erdine¹

¹Department of Algology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. algomed@superonline.com

Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'Nin Yayin Organidir = the Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology

|February 4, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Interventional pain management uses neuroablative and neuromodulatory techniques. Neuroablation physically interrupts pain pathways, while neuromodulation dynamically inhibits them, offering precise cancer pain treatment options.

More Related Videos

Targeted Neuronal Injury for the Non-Invasive Disconnection of Brain Circuitry

Targeted Neuronal Injury for the Non-Invasive Disconnection of Brain Circuitry

Published on: September 27, 2020

An Ultrasonic Tool for Nerve Conduction Block in Diabetic Rat Models

An Ultrasonic Tool for Nerve Conduction Block in Diabetic Rat Models

Published on: October 20, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Electrophysiological Methods to Assess Peripheral Pain Block in an Anesthetized Rat

Electrophysiological Methods to Assess Peripheral Pain Block in an Anesthetized Rat

Published on: November 21, 2025

Targeted Neuronal Injury for the Non-Invasive Disconnection of Brain Circuitry

Targeted Neuronal Injury for the Non-Invasive Disconnection of Brain Circuitry

Published on: September 27, 2020

An Ultrasonic Tool for Nerve Conduction Block in Diabetic Rat Models

An Ultrasonic Tool for Nerve Conduction Block in Diabetic Rat Models

Published on: October 20, 2017

Area of Science:

Pain management and interventional neurology.

Background:

Interventional techniques for pain management are broadly categorized into neuroablative and neuromodulatory procedures.
Neuroablative techniques involve the physical interruption of pain pathways.
Neuromodulatory techniques focus on dynamic and functional inhibition of pain pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the interventional techniques used in cancer pain management.
To highlight the historical and evolving role of neuroablative procedures.

Main Methods:

Discussion of neuroablative methods (surgical, chemical, thermal interruption of pain pathways).
Discussion of neuromodulatory methods (intraspinal/intraventricular drug administration, stimulation).

Main Results:

Neuroablative techniques have a long history in cancer pain treatment.
Advancements in imaging, such as fluoroscopy, have significantly improved the precision and efficiency of neuroablative procedures.

Conclusions:

Interventional pain management offers distinct approaches for cancer pain.
Technological advancements continue to enhance the efficacy and safety of neuroablative interventions for pain relief.