Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
[The accuracy of posterior curvature method in corneal power calculation after LASIK surgery]
Yi-qian Hu1, Xiu-li Zhou, Yin Li
1Department of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200092, China. damihyq@hotmail.com
Objective:
To estimate the accuracy of posterior curvature method in corneal power calculation after LASIK surgery.
Methods:
Corneal power calculation in 11 eyes that underwent Intraocular Lens (IOL) implantation after LASIK surgery (10 cases of Phaco + IOL, 1 case of IOL displacement), all of which used posterior curvature method, was analyzed retrospectively. The differences between post-operative stable refraction and target refraction were calculated, the actual corneal powers were deduced, and the expected refractive errors using other corneal power evaluation methods (auto-keratometry, corneal topography, spherical equivalent method, anterior curvature method, Equivalent K Reading method provided by Pentacam) were analyzed. In addition, refraction of 23 eyes underwent LASIK surgery were done on their 6 months follow-up. The theoretical corneal powers were deduced by subtracting the change of refraction before and after LASIK surgery from the pre-operative corneal powers. The differences between calculated corneal powers using posterior curvature method and the theoretical corneal powers were analyzed, and were compared with other corneal power evaluation methods.
Results:
The mean uncorrected post-operative visual acuity of IOL implantation eyes using posterior curvature method was 0.8 +/- 0.2, with mean absolute refractive error from target of (0.36 +/- 0.36) D (-0.63 to +0.85 D). The ratio of eyes with absolute error within 0.25 D, 0.50 D, and 1.00 D was 55%, 73%, and 91% respectively. This result was significantly lower than that of the auto-keratometry (2.50 +/- 1.08) D, corneal topography (1.90 +/- 0.88) D, and those obtained from spherical equivalent method (2.09 +/- 1.62) D (P < 0.01) or anterior curvature method (1.45 +/- 1.10) D (P < 0.05). It also showed less bias (-1.13 to 0.85 D) when compared to the Equivalent K Reading (-1.10 to 1.80 D), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). For the 23 post LASIK eyes, the absolute difference between the corrected corneal power using posterior curvature method and theoretical power was (0.67 +/- 0.45) D, also showed least bias compared with other methods.
Conclusion:
It is a practical and accurate way to calculate the corneal power after LASIK surgery using posterior curvature method.
