Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

03:30
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy with Uterine Preservation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: October 25, 2024
Posterior wall prolapse and repair
Bela I Kudish1, Cheryl B Iglesia
1Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA. Bela.I.Kudish@medstar.net
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
|February 10, 2010
Summary
Rectocele, a common posterior wall defect, can cause pelvic fullness and dysfunction. Traditional posterior colporrhaphy surgery offers high cure rates, with current evidence not supporting graft use in posterior compartment repairs.
Area of Science:
- Gynecology
- Urogynecology
- Pelvic Floor Disorders
Background:
- Posterior wall defects, including rectoceles, frequently coexist with other pelvic support issues.
- Rectoceles can range from asymptomatic to causing significant pelvic fullness, defecatory, and sexual dysfunction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current understanding and treatment of rectoceles.
- To evaluate the efficacy of surgical interventions for posterior wall defects.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies on rectocele diagnosis and management.
- Analysis of surgical outcomes for posterior compartment reconstruction.
Main Results:
- Conservative treatments like pelvic floor physiotherapy and pessaries are options for symptomatic rectoceles.
- Traditional posterior colporrhaphy demonstrates excellent cure rates, up to 95%.
- Current evidence does not support the use of biologic or synthetic absorbable grafts for posterior compartment repairs, as they offer no improvement over traditional methods.
Conclusions:
- Rectocele management involves conservative options for mild cases and surgical repair for persistent symptoms.
- Traditional posterior colporrhaphy remains the gold standard for surgical rectocele repair.
- Graft utilization in posterior compartment surgery is not recommended based on current scientific literature.
