Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
Published on: August 8, 2019
Validation of the ActiGraph two-regression model for predicting energy expenditure
Megan P Rothney1, Robert J Brychta, Natalie N Meade
1National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/Clinical Endocrinology Branch, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
This study validated a two-regression model using ActiGraph activity counts to predict energy expenditure (EE), finding good agreement with room calorimeter and doubly labeled water (DLW) measurements. A low-pass filter (LPF) improved EE prediction accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Wearable Technology
Background:
- Accurate measurement of energy expenditure (EE) is crucial for understanding human metabolism and physical activity.
- Wearable accelerometers, like the ActiGraph GT1M, offer a practical method for monitoring physical activity and estimating EE in free-living conditions.
- Validation against criterion methods such as whole-room indirect calorimetry and doubly labeled water (DLW) is essential for establishing the reliability of these devices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate a two-regression model for predicting EE from ActiGraph GT1M accelerometer data.
- To assess the impact of a low-pass filter (LPF) on the accuracy of minute-to-minute EE predictions.
- To compare model-predicted EE with measurements from a whole-room indirect calorimeter and the DLW technique.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-four healthy volunteers participated in a 24-hour whole-room calorimetry study involving structured and self-selected activities.
- ActiGraph GT1M monitors were worn to collect activity counts.
- A subset of 22 volunteers underwent a 14-day free-living DLW protocol.
Main Results:
- The two-regression model overpredicted EE by 10.2% compared to the room calorimeter.
- The LPF significantly reduced errors in EE prediction but did not improve the accuracy of predicting time spent in different physical activity intensities.
- Predicted EE from both filtered and unfiltered models showed no significant difference compared to DLW-measured EE.
Conclusions:
- The validated two-regression model, particularly with the LPF, demonstrates good agreement for total EE estimation against criterion measures (room calorimeter and DLW).
- Despite good overall EE prediction, significant individual variability persists in accurately assessing time spent in sedentary and light-to-moderate physical activity intensities.
Related Concept Videos
Energy Balance
Energy Budgets and Reproductive Strategies
Regression Analysis
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
