Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
Published on: July 24, 2021
Cefepime and mortality: a real issue?
Jeroen Mebis1, Herman Goossens, Zwi Nisan Berneman
1Department of Medical Oncology, Virga Jesse Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium. jeroen.mebis@virgajesse.be
Abstract:
The fourth-generation cephalosporin, cefepime, has an antimicrobial spectrum that makes it a valuable antibiotic for empirical treatment of neutropenic fever. Randomized trials have proven the efficacy and safety of cefepime in neutropenic fever. However, 2 recent meta-analyses have shown an increased all-cause mortality for cefepime. Since then, many clinicians have been left in doubt about the use of cefepime for this indication. In this paper, we put in perspective some of the methodological and clinical issues and call for further clinical analyses.
Insights
Cefepime is an effective antibiotic for neutropenic fever, but recent studies suggest increased mortality. Further analysis is needed to clarify its use in treating this condition.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Oncology
Background:
- Cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, is widely used for empirical treatment of neutropenic fever due to its broad antimicrobial spectrum.
- Randomized controlled trials have previously established the efficacy and safety of cefepime for neutropenic fever.
- Recent meta-analyses have raised concerns, indicating a potential increase in all-cause mortality associated with cefepime use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the conflicting evidence regarding cefepime's use in neutropenic fever.
- To address the methodological and clinical uncertainties stemming from recent meta-analyses.
- To provide a balanced perspective on the continued use of cefepime for this indication.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of existing randomized controlled trials on cefepime for neutropenic fever.
- Critical appraisal of recent meta-analyses reporting increased all-cause mortality with cefepime.
- Discussion of potential confounding factors and limitations in the existing data.
Main Results:
- Established efficacy and safety of cefepime in prior clinical trials for neutropenic fever.
- Identification of potential biases and limitations within recent meta-analyses.
- Highlighting the need for careful consideration of patient populations and study methodologies.
Conclusions:
- Despite recent concerns, cefepime remains a valuable option for empirical treatment of neutropenic fever.
- Methodological issues in recent meta-analyses may have influenced their findings.
- Further rigorous clinical analyses are warranted to definitively assess the risk-benefit profile of cefepime in neutropenic fever.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Kaplan-Meier Approach

