Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
06:40
G2-seq: A High Throughput Sequencing-based Technique for Identifying Late Replicating Regions of the Genome
Published on: March 22, 2018
2x genomes--depth does matter
Michel C Milinkovitch1, Raphaël Helaers, Eric Depiereux
1Laboratory of Artificial and Natural Evolution (LANE), Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, Sciences III, 30, Quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. michel.milinkovitch@unige.ch
Genome Biology
|February 11, 2010
Summary
Low-coverage genomes create significant false gene losses and duplication artifacts in evolutionary studies. Achieving high-coverage sequencing and balanced taxon sampling is crucial for accurate genome evolution analysis.
Area of Science:
- Comparative genomics
- Evolutionary biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Full genome sequences enable gene evolution mapping, but overemphasis on conserved features leads to low-coverage sequencing.
- Limitations of low-coverage genome analysis in evolutionary studies are not fully quantified.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of low-coverage genomes on gene gain and loss inferences in eukaryote genome evolution.
- To quantify the effects of low-coverage sequencing on evolutionary analyses.
Main Methods:
- Utilized recently developed comparative genomic application systems.
- Analyzed eukaryote genome evolution through gene duplication.
- Assessed gene gains and losses in low-coverage versus high-coverage genomes.
Main Results:
- Low-coverage genomes produce numerous false gene losses.
- Significant artifacts in gene duplication inference occur, particularly at the most recent common ancestor of low-coverage genomes.
- Artifacts stem from low genome coverage, not increased taxon sampling.
Conclusions:
- Differentiating true evolutionary changes from artifacts requires homogeneous taxon sampling and high-coverage sequencing.
- Improved data quality is essential for evolutionary biologists to understand biological diversity mechanisms.
- Homogeneity in sequencing depth and species representation is vital for reliable genome evolution studies.
Related Concept Videos
02:37Gene Duplication and Divergence
The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are characterized.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are characterized.
02:54Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
01:08Evolution of Microbial Genome
Microbial genome evolution is a highly dynamic process shaped by continual gene gain and loss across species and strains. This genomic flexibility allows microorganisms to adapt rapidly to environmental pressures and interactions with other organisms. Central to understanding this diversity is the distinction between the core and pan genomes.The core genome comprises the genes shared by all sampled strains of a species, representing essential functions needed for fundamental cellular processes.
03:21Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
03:21Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
02:16Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...