Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Cue competition affects temporal dynamics of edge-assignment in human visual cortex.

Joseph L Brooks¹, Stephen E Palmer

¹Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK. joseph.brooks@ucl.ac.uk

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

|February 12, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Sensitivity to negative-feedback processing in people with Parkinson's disease and impulsive-compulsive behaviours.

Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)·2025

Same author

The effect of swearing on error-related negativity as an indicator for state disinhibition.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024

Same author

Breaking the circularity in circular analyses: Simulations and formal treatment of the flattened average approach.

PLoS computational biology·2020

Same author

Response dependence of reversal-related ERP components in perception of ambiguous figures.

Psychophysiology·2020

Same author

Theta Phase-dependent Modulation of Perception by Concurrent Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Periodic Visual Stimulation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2020

Same author

Color, Music, and Emotion: Bach to the Blues.

i-Perception·2018

This study reveals how the brain combines visual cues to determine figure-ground organization. Competing cues for edge assignment can alter the timing of neural responses, suggesting a competitive process in visual perception.

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Science
Visual Perception

Background:

Edge assignment is crucial for depth and shape perception.
Neural mechanisms for combining edge-assignment cues are not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

Investigate neural mechanisms of edge-assignment cue combination.
Examine how extremal edge and attention cues interact.
Understand the temporal dynamics of figure-ground organization.

Main Methods:

Manipulated extremal edge and attention cues to create cooperation or competition.
Measured steady-state visual-evoked potentials (SSVEPs) by flickering figure/ground regions.
Analyzed SSVEP responses to index neural representations.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Main Results:

Figural regions showed stronger SSVEPs than ground regions, irrespective of attention.
Cue competition and cooperation influenced temporal dynamics of edge assignment.
Earlier SSVEP peak during cue cooperation versus competition was observed.

Conclusions:

Figure-ground organization involves competitive neural processes.
These competitive processes can impact the latency of figural assignment.
Evidence supports a winner-take-all outcome in edge-assignment cue integration.