Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II01:09

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II

Professional accountability in nursing is a multifaceted concept that encompasses professional ethics, legal standards, and employment expectations. This framework ensures that nurses maintain and elevate the quality of care while upholding the values of their profession. It compels them to treat patients, families, and colleagues with respect, compassion, and integrity.
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide comfort...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Articulating a role for program evaluation in responsible conduct of research programs.

Accountability in research·2013
Same author

Case study in planning revisions to a veterinary professional curriculum: opportunity, motive, and means.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2011
Same author

Content analysis of a stratified random selection of JVME articles: 1974-2004.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2011
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Developing a framework for assessing responsible conduct of research education programs.

Lynne E Olson1

  • 1College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, 301 Goss Laboratories, Columbus, OH 43210-1005, USA. olson.3@osu.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|February 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) education in the US now includes faculty and staff, necessitating new evaluation models. A performance-monitoring tool assesses RCR programs for improved compliance and quality.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Research ethics education
  • Scientific integrity training

Background:

  • Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) education has expanded beyond trainees to include faculty and staff.
  • Federal mandates and recommendations have increased the focus and compliance requirements for RCR education.
  • Traditional academic evaluation models are insufficient for institutional RCR programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a program evaluation model for institutional RCR education.
  • To create a tool for documenting and assessing RCR educational programs.
  • To support continuous improvement of RCR education quality.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of corporate compliance models.
  • Development of a programmed question series based on a performance-monitoring evaluation model.
  • Alignment of questions with the nine RCR content areas identified by the US Office of Research Integrity.

Main Results:

  • A program evaluation module was created to assess RCR education.
  • The module includes questions on goals, resources, content, delivery, outcomes, compliance, and feedback.
  • The evaluation tool facilitates documentation and continuous improvement of RCR programs.

Conclusions:

  • The developed evaluation model provides a framework for assessing institutional RCR education programs.
  • The tool supports formative assessment and feedback for ongoing program enhancement.
  • This approach addresses the evolving landscape of research compliance and education.