Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

05:12
Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
Published on: September 18, 2017
Asymmetrical intermanual transfer of learning in a sensorimotor task.
Waldemar Kirsch1, Joachim Hoffmann
1Institut für Psychologie III der Universität Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. kirsch@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de
Experimental Brain Research
|February 17, 2010
Summary
Sensorimotor learning differs between dominant and non-dominant hands. Training with the right hand improved transfer to the same sequence, while the left hand improved transfer to a mirrored sequence, showing distinct knowledge acquisition.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Sensorimotor learning is crucial for skilled movements.
- Understanding how the dominant versus non-dominant hand influences learning is key to motor control research.
- Serial reaction time tasks are standard for assessing sequence learning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of hand dominance on the nature of acquired sequence knowledge.
- To determine if training with the dominant or non-dominant hand leads to different transfer effects.
Main Methods:
- Right-handed participants performed a serial reaction time task.
- Training involved sequences of finger postures using either the dominant (right) or non-dominant (left) hand.
- Transfer was tested by switching hands and/or using a mirror-ordered stimulus sequence.
Main Results:
- Training with the right hand resulted in increased transfer to the same stimulus sequence with practice.
- Training with the left hand led to increased transfer to a homologous finger sequence (mirror-ordered stimuli) with practice.
- These findings suggest distinct sequence knowledge representations for dominant and non-dominant hands.
Conclusions:
- The hand used during sensorimotor learning significantly influences the type of sequence knowledge acquired.
- Dominant and non-dominant motor systems exhibit qualitative differences in how they encode and transfer learned sequences.
- This has implications for understanding motor plasticity and designing rehabilitation strategies.

