Comparison of reflex modification procedures and auditory brainstem response in high-risk neonates

E K Anday1, M E Cohen, H S Hoffman

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

Insights

This study compared reflex modification (RM) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) in high-risk infants. Findings suggest shared neural pathways between startle response and auditory processing, aiding in infant neurodevelopment assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Developmental Pediatrics

Background:

  • Assessing brainstem sensorineural processing in high-risk infants is crucial.
  • Objective techniques are needed for reliable neurodevelopmental evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare reflex modification (RM) with auditory brainstem response (ABR) in high-risk infants.
  • To investigate shared neural mechanisms between startle response and auditory processing.

Main Methods:

  • 37 high-risk infants were tested using both RM and ABR.
  • RM involved eyeblink-eliciting glabella taps, with and without a 90dB SPL tone.
  • Auditory brainstem response (ABR) was used as a comparative measure.

Main Results:

  • Seven infants failed ABR (increased brainstem conduction time).
  • Eight infants failed RM (no significant reflex augmentation).
  • Seven of the infants who failed RM also failed ABR.

Conclusions:

  • Sensory stimuli impacting startle response and auditory processing share neural components.
  • RM shows potential as an objective measure for brainstem processing in infants.
  • These findings contribute to understanding neurodevelopmental pathways in high-risk infants.

Related Concept Videos