Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

06:34
Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Three-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization iterative protocol for evaluation of left ventricular
Luca Ceriani1, Teresa Ruberto, Angelika Bischof Delaloye
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT Centre, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland. luca.ceriani@eoc.ch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
|February 18, 2010
Summary
Optimizing the 3D OSEM algorithm for gated SPECT (G-SPECT) accurately calculates left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using the QGS program. However, the algorithm tends to underestimate left ventricular volumes, though variations in parameters yield clinically similar results.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Medical Imaging
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Quantitative assessment of left ventricular (LV) function is crucial in cardiovascular diagnostics.
- Gated-SPECT (G-SPECT) using technetium-99m agents is a common imaging modality.
- Accurate quantification relies on effective image reconstruction algorithms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of a 3D ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm for LV function quantification in G-SPECT.
- To optimize reconstruction parameters for the QGS program using a beating-heart phantom.
- To assess the impact of parameter variations on LV volume and ejection fraction measurements.
Main Methods:
- A dynamic heart phantom simulating LV function was imaged using G-SPECT.
- Tomographic reconstructions were performed using 3D OSEM with varying iterations (I), subsets (S), and Gaussian post-processing filter cutoff values (FWHM).
- Quantitative measurements of LV volumes and ejection fraction were obtained using the QGS program.
Main Results:
- The optimized 3D OSEM algorithm (10 iterations, 8 subsets, 10 mm FWHM) provided accurate LV ejection fraction (LVEF) calculations.
- LV volumes (EDV, ESV, SV) were consistently underestimated compared to known phantom volumes.
- Parameter variations within a defined range (80-160 EM-equivalent iterations, FWHM ≤10 mm) showed minimal clinically relevant differences in LVEF and volumes.
Conclusions:
- The QGS program, coupled with an optimized 3D OSEM algorithm, can accurately determine LVEF from G-SPECT data.
- LV volume underestimation by the algorithm requires consideration in clinical interpretation.
- The study identified optimal reconstruction parameters and demonstrated robustness to minor parameter adjustments for clinical applications.

