Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a bonus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinct Hippocampal Mechanisms Support Concept Formation and Updating.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Confidence-weighted integration of human and machine judgments for superior decision-making.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Adaptive stretching of representations across brain regions and deep learning model layers.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Seeking New Information With Old Questions: Children and Adults Reuse and Recombine Concepts From Prior Questions.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2025
Same author

Correction: A Comprehensive Behavioral Dataset for the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

A Comprehensive Behavioral Dataset for the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus.

Scientific data·2025
Same journal

Corrigendum to "An entropy model of decision uncertainty" [Journal of Mathematical Psychology 125 (2025), 102919].

Journal of mathematical psychology·2025
Same journal

An entropy model of decision uncertainty.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2025
Same journal

How do people build up visual memory representations from sensory evidence? Revisiting two classic models of choice.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2024
Same journal

Experiment-based calibration in psychology: Optimal design considerations.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2024
Same journal

Expressions for Bayesian confidence of drift diffusion observers in fluctuating stimuli tasks.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2024
Same journal

A Statistical Foundation for Derived Attention.

Journal of mathematical psychology·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Learning in Noise: Dynamic Decision-Making in a Variable Environment.

Todd M Gureckis1, Bradley C Love

  • 1New York University.

Journal of Mathematical Psychology
|February 18, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People learn control strategies differently based on feedback variability. Noisy state cues impair strategy identification, while reward uncertainty can improve exploration and performance in decision-making tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Reinforcement learning
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Noise and uncertainty in engineering systems often obscure signals and increase measurement uncertainty.
  • The impact of noise and uncertainty is not universally negative and can influence learning and decision-making.
  • Understanding how variability affects learning is crucial for designing effective human-in-the-loop systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals learn sequential control strategies under varying feedback variability.
  • To examine the differential effects of uncertainty in state cues versus reward signals on learning.
  • To test predictions from reinforcement learning models regarding dynamic decision-making under uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in a sequential control task with conflicting short-term and long-term rewards.
  • Experimentally manipulated the noise and uncertainty associated with state cues and reward feedback.
  • Analyzed participant behavior in relation to reinforcement learning principles.

Main Results:

  • Learners showed impaired strategy identification when state-predictive cues were noisy and uncertain.
  • Uncertainty in reward signals, conversely, sometimes enhanced performance by promoting exploration.
  • Differential weighting of information predictive of the current task state was observed.

Conclusions:

  • The source and nature of feedback variability significantly impact the learning of sequential control strategies.
  • Reinforcement learning principles effectively model how learners adapt to uncertainty in dynamic decision-making.
  • Task variability can be strategically manipulated to probe and understand learning mechanisms.