Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Intravital Longitudinal Imaging of Vascular Dynamics in the Calvarial Bone Marrow
Published on: April 11, 2025
Stress analysis in simulation models with or without implant threads representation
Wirley Gonçalves Assunção1, Erica Alves Gomes, Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão
1Department of Dental materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil. wirley@foa.unesp.br
Simulating dental implant threads in finite element analysis (FEA) significantly impacts stress values in cortical bone, though stress distribution remains similar. Accurate thread representation is crucial for precise FEA outcomes in dental implant research.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Computational Mechanics
- Dental Implantology
Background:
- Finite element analysis (FEA) is a valuable tool for simulating biomechanical behavior.
- Accurate modeling of dental implants is essential for predicting stress distribution and optimizing design.
- Understanding the influence of implant surface features, like threads, on stress is critical for clinical success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of simulating dental implant threads versus smooth surfaces on two-dimensional finite element analysis outcomes.
- To compare stress values and distribution in edentulous mandibular bone models with precise and simplified implant representations.
Main Methods:
- Two-dimensional finite element models of edentulous mandibular posterior bone were created.
- Models included either accurately simulated implant threads (precise model) or smooth surfaces (simplified model).
- A 133 N load was applied at a 30-degree angulation, 2 mm off-axis, and Von Mises stresses were measured using ANSYS software.
Main Results:
- The precise model exhibited higher maximum stress values (1.45 MPa) compared to the simplified model (1.2 MPa).
- Cortical bone showed a substantial difference in stress values (~36%) between the precise (292.95 MPa) and simplified (401.14 MPa) models.
- Trabecular bone displayed similar stress distribution and values (19.35 MPa vs. 20.35 MPa) between the two models.
- Stress concentrations were observed around the implant neck and apex in both models.
Conclusions:
- Simulating implant threads significantly influences absolute stress values, particularly in cortical bone.
- Despite differences in absolute stress, the overall stress distribution patterns were similar between precise and simplified models.
- Accurate representation of implant threads is important for detailed stress analysis in dental implant FEA.
Related Concept Videos
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes.
Design of Transmission Shafts - Stress Analysis
Residual Stresses in Circular Shafts
Normal Strain under Axial Loading
True Stress and True Strain
In contrast, true stress offers a more precise portrayal. It is computed by dividing the...

