Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Donor Posterior Atrial Flap Rotation for Left Atrial Cuff Reconstruction in Lung Transplantation
Published on: October 11, 2024
Center variation and outcomes associated with delayed sternal closure after stage 1 palliation for hypoplastic left
Jason N Johnson1, James Jaggers, Shuang Li
1Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27715, USA.
Insights
Delayed sternal closure after stage 1 palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome varies widely. More frequent use is linked to longer hospital stays and increased infection rates in infants.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
- Congenital Heart Disease Management
- Surgical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Debate exists regarding optimal sternal closure strategy after stage 1 palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS).
- Center variation in the use of delayed sternal closure (DSC) after stage 1 palliation is significant.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine center variation in DSC use following stage 1 palliation for HLHS.
- To assess the association between DSC use and key postoperative outcomes, including mortality, prolonged length of stay, and infection.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Database (2000-2007) for patients undergoing stage 1 palliation for HLHS.
- Comparison of outcomes (in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, postoperative infection) across centers categorized by low, middle, and high DSC utilization rates.
- Multivariable analysis adjusting for patient and center-specific factors.
Main Results:
- A total of 1283 patients from 45 centers were included; 74% of cases utilized DSC overall, with center variation ranging from 3% to 100%.
- Centers with high and middle DSC use showed significantly higher rates of prolonged length of stay and postoperative infection compared to low DSC use centers.
- Multivariable analysis revealed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality, but confirmed associations between higher DSC use and increased length of stay and infection.
Conclusions:
- The application of DSC after stage 1 palliation for HLHS exhibits considerable variability among institutions.
- Increased utilization of DSC appears correlated with adverse outcomes, specifically longer hospitalizations and higher infection rates.
- Further research is warranted to elucidate the precise risks and benefits of DSC in this complex pediatric population.
Objective:
There is debate whether primary or delayed sternal closure is the best strategy after stage 1 palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. We describe center variation in delayed sternal closure after stage 1 palliation and associated outcomes.
Methods:
Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Database participants performing stage 1 palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome from 2000 to 2007 were included. We examined center variation in delayed sternal closure and compared in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (length of stay > 6 weeks), and postoperative infection in centers with low (< or = 25% of cases), middle (26%-74% of cases), and high (> or = 75% of cases) delayed sternal closure use, adjusting for patient and center factors.
Results:
There were 1283 patients (45 centers) included. Median age at surgery was 6 days (interquartile range, 4-9 days), and median weight at surgery was 3.2 kg (interquartile range, 2.8-3.5 kg); 59% were male. Delayed sternal closure was used in 74% of cases (range, 3%-100% of cases/center). In centers with high (n = 23) and middle (n = 17) versus low (n = 5) delayed sternal closure use, there was a greater proportion of patients with prolonged length of stay and infection, and a trend toward increased in-hospital mortality in unadjusted analysis. In multivariable analysis, there was no difference in mortality. Centers with high and middle delayed sternal closure use had prolonged length of stay (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-5.47; P = .002 and odds ratio, 2.23; confidence interval, 1.17-4.26; P = .02, respectively) and more infection (odds ratio, 2.34; confidence interval, 1.20-4.57; P = .01 and odds ratio, 2.37; confidence interval, 1.36-4.16; P = .003, respectively).
Conclusion:
Use of delayed sternal closure after stage 1 palliation varies widely. These observational data suggest that more frequent use of delayed sternal closure is associated with longer length of stay and higher postoperative infection rates. Further evaluation of the risks and benefits of delayed sternal closure in the management of these complex infants is necessary.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
