Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physics-informed data augmentation to simulate low dose CT scans: Application to lung nodule detection.

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Synthetic data in radiological imaging: current state and future outlook.

BJR artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Task-Based Sampling of Patient Data for Rigorous Machine Learning/AI Performance Assessment.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

Statistical testing of agreement in overlap-based performance between an AI segmentation device and a multi-expert human panel without requiring a reference standard.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2025
Same author

A data-driven framework for identifying patient subgroups on which an AI/machine learning model may underperform.

NPJ digital medicine·2024
Same author

Bias Amplification to Facilitate the Systematic Evaluation of Bias Mitigation Methods.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2024
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Dynamic multiple thresholding breast boundary detection algorithm for mammograms.

Yi-Ta Wu1, Chuan Zhou, Heang-Ping Chan

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Michigan 48109, USA. yitawu@itri.org.tw

Medical Physics
|February 24, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new dynamic multiple thresholding based breast boundary (MTBB) detection method significantly improves automated breast boundary detection in mammograms. This method outperforms previous gradient-based approaches, enhancing computer-aided diagnosis accuracy.

More Related Videos

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
09:21

Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images

Published on: February 18, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
09:21

Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images

Published on: February 18, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Computer-Aided Diagnosis
  • Image Processing

Background:

  • Automated breast boundary detection is crucial for mammogram analysis.
  • Accurate boundary detection aids in the early and precise diagnosis of breast diseases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a novel dynamic multiple thresholding based breast boundary (MTBB) detection method.
  • To enhance the accuracy of automated breast boundary detection in digitized mammograms.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a two-stage MTBB method using dynamic thresholding and Sobel filtering on 716 mammograms.
  • Established a reference standard through manual boundary tracing by an experienced radiologist.
  • Evaluated accuracy using Hausdorff distance, average minimum Euclidean distance, and area overlap measure.

Main Results:

  • MTBB-Final achieved 94% accuracy for Hausdorff distance < 6 pixels, compared to 68% for the gradient-based method.
  • 96% of images showed average minimum Euclidean distance < 1.5 pixels with MTBB-Final.
  • Area overlap measure > 0.9 was achieved for 99% of images using MTBB-Final, showing statistically significant improvement (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

  • The MTBB approach, integrating dynamic multiple thresholding and gradient information, offers superior performance.
  • This method significantly enhances automated breast boundary detection accuracy in mammograms.
  • The improved accuracy supports more reliable computer-aided analysis for breast cancer screening.