Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
The relationship between program implementation and evaluation on the TCE/HIV projects
Susan C Kinnevy1, Tara Jean Sununu
1School of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. kinnevy@sp2.upenn.edu
This study surveyed directors and evaluators of the Federal Targeted Capacity Expansion Program for Substance Abuse Treatment and HIV/AIDS Services grants. Findings reveal key aspects of their working relationships to improve grant-funded project success.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
- Program Evaluation
Background:
- The Federal Targeted Capacity Expansion Program for Substance Abuse Treatment and HIV/AIDS Services grants are crucial for addressing co-occurring health issues.
- Understanding the dynamics between program implementation and evaluation is vital for grant effectiveness.
- Existing literature lacks detailed insights into the director-evaluator relationship within these specific grants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the working relationship between program directors and evaluators in federally funded substance abuse and HIV/AIDS projects.
- To identify strengths and limitations of different structural arrangements guiding director-evaluator collaborations.
- To inform best practices for enhancing the success of grant-funded initiatives.
Main Methods:
- A survey was administered to program directors and evaluators involved in the Federal Targeted Capacity Expansion Program for Substance Abuse Treatment and HIV/AIDS Services grants.
- The survey collected data on the nature of the working relationship, communication, and collaboration.
- Analysis focused on identifying patterns and challenges in director-evaluator interactions.
Main Results:
- Program directors and evaluators reported varying levels of collaboration and communication.
- Specific structural arrangements were associated with perceived strengths and limitations in the working relationship.
- Key factors influencing successful partnerships were identified, including clear roles and mutual respect.
Conclusions:
- The director-evaluator relationship significantly impacts the implementation and evaluation of the Targeted Capacity Expansion Program for Substance Abuse Treatment and HIV/AIDS Services grants.
- Optimizing collaborative structures can enhance project outcomes and grant effectiveness.
- Further research and targeted support are recommended to strengthen these critical partnerships.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

