Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scanning Electron Microscopy01:07

Scanning Electron Microscopy

A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to study the surface features of a sample by using an electron beam that scans the sample surface in a two-dimensional manner. Typically, areas between ~1 centimeter to 5 micrometers in width can be imaged. SEM can be used to image bacteria, viruses, tissues as well as larger samples like insects. Conventional SEM gives a magnification ranging from 20X to 30,000X and spatial resolution of 50 to 100 nanometers.
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing clinically cardiovascular machine learning model for risk prediction via sample augmentation.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Serum amino acid metabolome alteration associated with urinary metal profiles among solar greenhouse workers: Findings from a cross-sectional study.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2026
Same author

A profile analysis of leader interpersonal emotion management strategies.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same author

High-fidelity fiber longitudinal power monitoring via non-uniform sparse regularization.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Pan-cancer analysis of the upstream regulator FDX1 in cuproptosis.

Discover oncology·2026
Same author

Visual and anatomic outcomes of epiretinal membrane surgery in highly myopic eyes with varying axial lengths.

International journal of ophthalmology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Light Microscopy (LM) Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
10:42

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Light Microscopy (LM) Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Published on: June 16, 2016

Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.

Wu Liu1, James A Zagzebski

  • 1Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. wuliu@stanford.edu;jazagzeb@wisc.edu

IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
|February 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Accurate estimation of subresolution scatterer size is crucial for ultrasound imaging. This study optimizes data acquisition and processing for improved backscatter coefficient and scatterer size estimations using clinical scanners.

More Related Videos

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples
10:12

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples

Published on: June 19, 2018

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement
11:38

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement

Published on: January 17, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Light Microscopy (LM) Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
10:42

In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Light Microscopy (LM) Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Published on: June 16, 2016

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples
10:12

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples

Published on: June 19, 2018

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement
11:38

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement

Published on: January 17, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Ultrasound imaging
  • Acoustic signal processing
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Estimating subresolution scatterer size is vital for quantitative ultrasound.
  • Backscatter coefficient and scatterer size estimations rely on analyzing echo signal power spectra.
  • Optimizing data acquisition and processing parameters is key for accurate estimations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate trade-offs in data acquisition and processing for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
  • To compare spectral estimation methods for accuracy and computational load.
  • To determine optimal parameters for improving scatterer size estimation accuracy and precision.

Main Methods:

  • Acquired radiofrequency (RF) echo data from a tissue-mimicking phantom using clinical scanners with 5-13 MHz and 4-9 MHz linear array transducers.
  • Compared spectral estimation methods, including Welch, rectangular, Hanning, Hamming, and multitaper methods.
  • Investigated the impact of averaging lateral A-lines and axial window length on estimation accuracy and precision.
  • Analyzed the influence of the ka range (wave number times effective scatterer size) on estimation performance.

Main Results:

  • The Welch method provided more accurate and precise backscatter coefficient and scatterer size estimations with reduced computational load compared to other windowing methods.
  • Averaging approximately 10 independent A-lines laterally with an axial window length 10 times the center frequency wavelength optimized trade-offs.
  • Using optimal analysis block dimensions with the 5-13 MHz transducer yielded scatterer size estimation accuracy and precision within approximately 5%.
  • The 4-9 MHz transducer resulted in approximately 10% accuracy and 10-25% precision.

Conclusions:

  • The Welch method and optimized data averaging significantly improve scatterer size estimation accuracy and precision.
  • The choice of transducer frequency bandwidth critically impacts estimation performance, with higher frequencies yielding better results within the tested ka range.
  • The findings are generalizable to similar clinical ultrasound arrays and varying scatterer sizes within a similar ka range.