Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
Published on: April 24, 2017
The mere exposure effect and recognition depend on the way you look!
Sylvie Willems1, Jonathan Dedonder, Martial Van der Linden
1University of Liège, Belgium. sylvie.willems@ulg.ac.be
Abstract:
In line with Whittlesea and Price (2001), we investigated whether the memory effect measured with an implicit memory paradigm (mere exposure effect) and an explicit recognition task depended on perceptual processing strategies, regardless of whether the task required intentional retrieval. We found that manipulation intended to prompt functional implicit-explicit dissociation no longer had a differential effect when we induced similar perceptual strategies in both tasks. Indeed, the results showed that prompting a nonanalytic strategy ensured performance above chance on both tasks. Conversely, inducing an analytic strategy drastically decreased both explicit and implicit performance. Furthermore, we noted that the nonanalytic strategy involved less extensive gaze scanning than the analytic strategy and that memory effects under this processing strategy were largely independent of gaze movement.
More Related Videos
08:53Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
First Impression
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Halo Effect
The Looking Glass Self