Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Optimal two-stage designs allowing flexibility in number of subjects for phase II clinical trials
Nobuyuki Masaki1, Tatsuki Koyama, Isao Yoshimura
1Department of Biostatistics, Bristol-Myers K.K, Tokyo, Japan. nobuyuki.masaki@bms.com
Abstract:
Phase II clinical trials are conducted to test whether a drug has a minimum desired effect and to assess whether further development of the drug is warranted. They are often designed as one-arm trials with response rate as the primary endpoint, and a two-stage design is often used to ensure early termination of the trial for futility. To control the type I error rate and guarantee the specified power of the study, planned sample sizes for both stages must be rigidly followed, but a literature review suggests that actual sample size often differs from that planned. We propose to extend simple two-stage designs to allow more flexible sampling plans in both stages. Our designs are preferable to similar extensions proposed to control type I and II error probabilities. Additionally, our assumptions regarding distribution of the actual sample size at the end of stage 1 are more lenient. A list of optimal designs for typical error rates and the selected null and alternative response rates is presented.
Insights
This study introduces flexible two-stage designs for Phase II clinical trials, improving upon existing methods for drug development. The new designs offer better control over statistical errors while allowing for more adaptable sample sizes.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
- Pharmaceutical Research
Background:
- Phase II clinical trials evaluate drug efficacy and guide further development.
- Commonly use one-arm designs with response rate as the primary endpoint.
- Two-stage designs aim for early termination due to futility, but rigid sample size adherence is challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose extended two-stage clinical trial designs with flexible sampling plans.
- To offer improved methods for controlling Type I and Type II error probabilities.
- To present optimal designs for various error rates and response rates.
Main Methods:
- Extending simple two-stage designs to incorporate flexible sampling at both stages.
- Developing designs that are preferable to existing extensions for error control.
- Utilizing more lenient assumptions for the distribution of sample size at stage 1.
Main Results:
- Proposed flexible designs offer advantages over similar extensions in controlling error probabilities.
- The new designs accommodate variations in actual sample size more effectively.
- A comprehensive list of optimal designs is provided for practical application.
Conclusions:
- Flexible two-stage designs enhance the adaptability of Phase II clinical trials.
- These designs provide robust statistical control while allowing for practical sample size adjustments.
- The presented optimal designs support informed decision-making in drug development pathways.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Clinical Trials: Overview
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

