Related Experiment Videos
[Decrease of early insulin secretion, risk factor of insulin-dependent diabetes. Prospective study in families with
J J Robert1, C Boitard, A Mogenet
1Département de Diabétologie (Centre de Dépistage et de Diagnostic du Diabète), Hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris.
Summary
The first phase insulin response (FPIR) alone cannot predict individual risk for insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM). While lower FPIR is seen in those with islet-cell antibodies (ICA), its predictive value for developing IDDM is limited.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Immunology
- Genetics
Background:
- Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is an autoimmune disease with genetic and immunological components.
- Predictive markers for IDDM onset are crucial for early intervention and understanding disease progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive capacity of the first phase insulin response (FPIR) for the development of IDDM.
- To assess the utility of FPIR in conjunction with islet-cell antibodies (ICA) and HLA-typing for risk stratification.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 220 first-degree relatives of IDDM patients (aged 2-29 years).
- Intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT) to measure FPIR, ICA determination, and HLA-typing.
- Follow-up for 18 months to 8 years to monitor disease development.
Main Results:
- Mean FPIR was significantly lower in ICA-positive subjects compared to ICA-negative subjects.
- A single low FPIR measurement did not predict individual IDDM development.
- ICA-positive subjects showed persistently low or decreasing FPIR over time, unlike ICA-negative subjects.
- Among 9 subjects who developed IDDM, most had persisting ICA and specific HLA types; FPIR was consistently low in only 3.
Conclusions:
- FPIR is a less reliable individual predictor of IDDM compared to persisting ICA and specific HLA genotypes.
- Changes in FPIR over time may reflect distinct disease trajectories in ICA-positive versus ICA-negative individuals.
- Combined immunological and genetic factors offer better risk assessment for IDDM than FPIR alone.