Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Controls in Experiments

Controls in Experiments

When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Improving Anemia and CurbinAg Transfusion in Gynecologic Surgery (IMPACT-GS): Multidisciplinary and multimodal pre-operative hemoglobin optimization.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC·2026

Same author

Identifying predictors of use of mental health services and supports during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the CHILD COVID-19 Add-on Study.

Frontiers in health services·2026

Same author

Every Six-Month versus Single-Dose Adjuvant Zoledronate in Early Breast Cancer.

NEJM evidence·2026

Same author

Impact of Palliative Care Educational Program on Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Pediatric Palliative Care Among Healthcare Professionals Working in Nepal.

Paediatric & neonatal pain·2026

Same author

From Insights to Action: Enhancing Clinical Research at The Ottawa Hospital through a Mixed-Methods Improvement Project.

Healthcare management forum·2026

Same author

Non-pharmacological interventions for managing sickle cell crisis pain: A qualitative study on adolescents' and caregivers' experiences.

The journal of pain·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Controlling bias in complex nursing intervention studies: a checklist.

Marsha Campbell-Yeo¹, Manon Ranger, Celeste Johnston

¹IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research = Revue Canadienne De Recherche En Sciences Infirmieres

|March 3, 2010

Summary

This study offers strategies to control bias in complex nursing intervention research. A checklist is provided to enhance scientific rigor and ensure reliable clinical information.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Nursing Research
Clinical Trials
Methodology

Background:

Bias, defined as systematic error, poses challenges in complex nursing intervention studies.
Difficulties in controlling bias stem from issues with blinding and selecting appropriate controls.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify strategies for controlling bias in complex nursing intervention studies.
To develop a checklist for researchers to minimize bias in study protocols.

Main Methods:

Literature review and expert opinion consultation.
Identification of six key areas in study protocol development for bias reduction.

Main Results:

Six critical areas for bias control were identified: study concept, intervention definition, comparison selection, randomization/allocation, intervention integrity, and outcome ascertainment.
A checklist was developed to aid researchers in protocol preparation.

Conclusions:

Implementing the checklist can enhance the scientific rigor of complex nursing intervention trials.
Reducing bias ensures the delivery of reliable information to clinicians.