Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding01:13

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding

Physiological models with protein binding in pharmacokinetics offer a sophisticated approach to understanding drug disposition. These models consider drug-protein interactions, enabling them to effectively predict drug concentrations in different organs and tissues. This precision aids in accurate drug dosing, providing a significant advantage over conventional models. A key process within these models is equilibration, which ensures that drug concentrations achieve a steady state within the...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical outcome of an SCNT-derived <i>MSTN</i> knockout buffalo: a case study.

Frontiers in genome editing·2026
Same author

Millets for food and nutritional security in semi-arid Bundelkhand, India: historical, scientific, and socio-economic perspectives.

Frontiers in nutrition·2026
Same author

Journey through technological advancements in radiation therapy.

World journal of radiology·2026
Same author

TOPSIS-Based Performance and Drilling Delamination Assessment of Chemically Treated PALF Composites for Lightweight UAVs.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Milk fat globule membrane from cow, goat, and human differentially modulate Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG: Proteomic insights from human MFGM.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

Multi-Criteria Optimization of Microwave-Cured Pineapple Leaf Fiber/LDPE Biocomposites for Enhanced Mechanical Performance.

ACS omega·2026
Same journal

BioMatics 1.0: A Wasserstein Distance Approach for Next-Generation Multiple Sequence Alignment.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Engineered HSP90-MP65 Bivalent Fusion Antigen: A Novel Vaccine Candidate Against Invasive Candidiasis.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Physics-Based Energy Functions for Computational Protein Design.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Impact of Stabilizing Osmolytes on the Conformational Dynamics of Human and Rat Islet Amyloid Polypeptides.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Stabilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 at Physiological pH: Contrasting Roles of CHAPS and Arginine in Aggregation Inhibition.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Structural Insights Into the Function of Leishmania major Adenylosuccinate Lyase.

Proteins·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry
13:26

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry

Published on: September 13, 2014

Thermodynamic resolution: how do errors in modeled protein structures affect binding affinity predictions?

Manoj Kumar Singh1, Brian N Dominy

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.

Proteins
|March 5, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Protein modeling errors significantly impact binding affinity calculations. Even minor structural distortions (less than 2 Å RMSD) cause notable deviations, with larger errors leading to greater inaccuracies in drug development predictions.

More Related Videos

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions
09:15

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions

Published on: November 21, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry
13:26

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry

Published on: September 13, 2014

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions
09:15

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions

Published on: November 21, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry and structural biology.
  • Drug discovery and development.

Background:

  • Protein structure modeling is crucial for understanding molecular interactions.
  • Errors in protein models can arise from various computational methods.
  • Accurate binding affinity prediction is essential for identifying drug candidates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the effect of structural distortion in protein models on calculated binding affinities.
  • To establish a relationship between protein structure errors and binding affinity prediction errors.
  • To assess the reliability of modeled protein structures for drug development.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of binding affinities for 300 distorted protein structures across five protein-ligand complexes.
  • Systematic analysis of binding affinity deviations based on root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of protein models.
  • Comparison of binding affinities calculated from distorted models versus crystal structures.

Main Results:

  • Protein models with <2 Å RMSD showed a 14.78% deviation in binding affinity.
  • Increasing RMSD values (2-3 Å, 3-4 Å, >4 Å) led to progressively higher affinity errors (20.8%, 22.79%, 29.43%).
  • A clear correlation exists between the degree of structural distortion and the magnitude of binding affinity error.

Conclusions:

  • Structural distortions in protein models significantly compromise the accuracy of binding affinity calculations.
  • The findings provide a quantitative basis for evaluating the quality of modeled protein structures in ligand-binding studies.
  • This research aids in optimizing the use of computational models for efficient drug discovery.