Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A compact low-power magnetic particle imaging scanner based on a permanent-magnet field-free-line generator with high gradient.

The Review of scientific instruments·2026
Same author

Sinomenine restrains the proliferation and hyperactivation of B lymphocytes partly by inhibiting interferon regulatory factor 5.

Journal of ethnopharmacology·2026
Same author

High-fidelity compressed high-speed imaging for resolving rapid micro-dynamics.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Atomically Regulated Symmetry-Breaking Sulfur-Bridged Dual Iron Sites Catalyst for High-Performance Oxygen Reduction Reaction.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same author

The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in the management of childhood asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in nutrition·2026
Same author

A wearable non-invasive sonogenetic pacemaker.

Nature biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Data fusion methods for the heterogeneity of treatment effect and confounding function.

Bernoulli : official journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability·2026
Same journal

Semiparametric regression of panel count data with informative terminal event.

Bernoulli : official journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability·2025
Same journal

Nonparametric inference for reversed mean models with panel count data.

Bernoulli : official journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability·2025
Same journal

Universal sieve-based strategies for efficient estimation using machine learning tools.

Bernoulli : official journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability·2021
Same journal

Bayesian graph selection consistency under model misspecification.

Bernoulli : official journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability·2021
Same journal

Expected Number and Height Distribution of Critical Points of Smooth Isotropic Gaussian Random Fields.

Bernoulli : official journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability·2019
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Variable Selection in Measurement Error Models.

Yanyuan Ma1, Runze Li

  • 1Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

Bernoulli : Official Journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability
|March 9, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for variable selection in measurement error models using penalized estimating equations. The proposed approach offers an effective solution to a previously unsolved problem in statistical modeling.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Econometrics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Measurement error models are common in various scientific fields, but parameter estimation is computationally intensive.
  • Lack of natural criterion functions and the need to solve integral equations complicate standard statistical analyses.
  • Traditional variable selection methods are inapplicable to measurement error models, leaving this a significant challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a general framework for variable selection in parametric and semiparametric measurement error models.
  • To address the computational and methodological challenges in selecting relevant variables within these models.
  • To establish the theoretical and practical viability of a novel variable selection approach.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a variable selection framework utilizing penalized estimating equations.
  • Proposal of selection procedures applicable to both parametric and semiparametric measurement error models.
  • Theoretical analysis of asymptotic properties for the proposed selection procedures.

Main Results:

  • Demonstration that the proposed penalized estimating equation method achieves oracle performance under specific conditions.
  • Validation of the method's effectiveness through Monte Carlo simulation studies.
  • Empirical illustration using a well-known dataset.

Conclusions:

  • The penalized estimating equation framework provides an effective solution for variable selection in measurement error models.
  • The proposed method demonstrates theoretical advantages and practical applicability.
  • This work advances statistical methodologies for handling complex data with measurement errors.