Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Corneal Donor Tissue Preparation for Endothelial Keratoplasty
Published on: June 12, 2012
[Reduced availability of potential cornea donors: reasons and suggestions]
K Rosenbaum1, J Rottler, R Steinbach
1Augenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Insights
Only 6% of potential cornea donors become actual donors due to medical staff and family refusal. Increased education for physicians and the public is crucial to improve cornea donation rates.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Transplant Surgery
- Public Health
Background:
- Corneal transplantation is vital for restoring sight.
- A significant gap exists between potential and actual cornea donors.
- Understanding donation barriers is critical for improving organ procurement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the discrepancy between potential and actual cornea donors.
- To identify the primary reasons for failed cornea donations.
- To evaluate the impact of medical staff, relatives, and organizational factors on donation rates.
Main Methods:
- Data collection over six months across six hospitals and a forensic medicine institute.
- Investigation into reasons for donor pool underutilization.
- Analysis of refusal causes, contraindications, and organizational issues.
Main Results:
- A mere 6% consent rate was achieved from potential cornea donors.
- Medical staff and relative refusals accounted for 60% of cases.
- Organizational problems (16%) and contraindications (18%) also contributed to donation failure.
Conclusions:
- Cornea donation rates are significantly limited by medical staff and family consent.
- Organizational inefficiencies represent a smaller but addressable barrier.
- Enhanced education for healthcare professionals and the public is essential to increase cornea donation rates.
Aim:
The purpose of the study was to analyse the number of potential cornea donors in relationship to the number of actual donors. Furthermore, the reasons for the discrepancy between the number of the potential and actual donors were analysed.
Methods:
Over a period of 6 months data were collected from 6 hospitals and the institute for forensic medicine of the university hospital. The reasons why only a few actual donors from a big pool of potential donors remain for transplantation were investigated.
Results:
Circumstances related to the medical staff were causal for refusal in 37 % of the cases. In 23 % the cause for refusal was related to the relatives (23 %). Furthermore, in 16 organisational problems caused a failure in cornea donation. 18 % were excluded due to contraindications. A total rate of 6 % actual donors was achieved.
Conclusions:
The final consent rate was only 6 % out of all potential donors. Organisational failure was only 16 % in contrast to 60 % refusal due to causes relating to medical staff and relatives. Therefore, further education of physicians and the public is needed.
